Why do people think Jeremy Corbyn is a terrorist sympethising antisemite?
Because despite his denials, he can’t produce counter evidence, but provides much circumstantial evidence that is typical of someone trying to avoid the charge without actually refuting it by explicit condemnation of the terrorist, turning up among terrorist supporters a little too often, and being quick and loud to condemn Israel while being reticent when he does condemn “all bombing” and continually failing in specific condemnation of the terrorists. In the case of Hamas he has been vocal in their support.
Twitter isn’t the sole output of any politician or commentator, but their bias on that platform is a good guide to their opinions, particularly if they use it frequently.
The horrific attacks by Hamas on Israelis and people of other nationalities on 7th October shocked the world. In many Muslim quarters, including in many Western towns and cities, it brought out the glorification of Hamas terrorism.
What we might expect of our politicians and political commentators, even those critical of Israel, is a swift, explicit and vehement condemnation of the Islamic terrorism of Hamas.
Not a chance of that from Corbyn. You could bet your shirt on it. That is not to say he has not condemned “all acts of violence” – it’s his duplicitous way of pretending he has covered his ass from charges of support for terrorists. However, the extent and tone of his coverage varies dramatically depending on who the victims are and who is doing the harm.
Corbyn’s usual output is two or more tweets a day on various topics, and that was the case from the 4th to the 6th October. On the 7th he managed one tweet, following the Hamas attack.
This was all he had to say on the day that Hamas attacked Israel, breaking through it’s border with Gaza, attacking and killing civillians, including people attending a music festival, and attended by the usual rain of rockets that are indescriminate in their targets (ironically to the extent that they don’t kill enough Israeli innocents as Hamas might wish, but do kill Gaza occupants when they go wrong, but the latter are involuntary sacrifical martyrs as far as Hamas are concerend).
In the face of the Hamas barbarism this is about as mealy-mouthed a comment Corbyn could get away with without showing actual support for the attack by what he calls “friends” and of whom he has this to say:
“The idea that an organisation dedicated towards the good of the Palestinian people and bringing about long term peace and social justice and political justice in the whole region should be labelled as a terrorist organisation by the British Government is a big big historical mistake.”
Corbyn supports Hamas, in his own words
- Dedicated to the good of the Palestinian people? No. They say not themselves, and even dismiss the well being of Palestinians, since according to the death cult they are martyrs for the cause.
- Bringing about long term peace? Clearly not. They killed their Fatah opposition, who knows how many Palestinians directly, and even non-Israeli nationals.
- Bringing about social justice? So, 7th October was social justice according to Corbyn? It’s not as if Corbyn didn’t know their history of killing Jewish and Muslim people.
- In the whole region? Their stated intent is to take over the whole region, not to benefit it … but of course, Jihad and genocide of Jews is a benefit as far as Hamas is concerned, so perhaps that’s what Jezbollah meant.
To be explicit: Hamas is a death cult terrorist organisation that has opposed peace at every turn unless on its own terms, which include the annihilationof Israel, the killing of Jews, kaffir, blasphemers, apostates and others that will not submit to Islam. Along with ISIS, an offshoot of Hamas, it is one of the many horrific Islamic terrorist organisations active today around the world, but with a direct focus on Israel and Jews. And Corbyn, by his own words, approves of this organisation.
Corbyn had nothing to say on Twitter or Facebook on the 9th October. Better to keep quiet than continue to put your foot in your mouth.
Despite the mounting evidence of the Hamas Horror Show, Corbyn manages only two tweets on the 10th. You’d think if he could manage any comment at all it would be to blast Hamas and distance himself from them. No. He continues to play the duplicitous game. Note how saying “The horrific attacks on civillians in Israel were deplorable” does not actually condemn Hamas, but instead is a lead into attacks on Israel. His “times of war” ignore totally the fact that Israel is fighting a terrorist organisation motivated by an insane Islamic supremacist ideology intent on wiping out Israel.
From then on on Twitter and Facebook it’s as if the Hamas attacks never happened because once more he cares only about ‘Palestine’.
Outside of Twitter and Facebook, Corbyn is asked by journalists if he will condemn Hamas explicitly. As in the past, he will not. He only ever offers the same old double-speak, “I condemn all killing.”
Here he is on Piers Morgan doing his damndest to not condemn Hamas. Not only, he lies explicitly about not supporting Hamas. You can see from his own words above that he has explicitly supported Hamas.
Well, Corbyn, you don’t condemn it all with the veracity and strength the acts required with regard to Hamas, and it appears from your own actions and words, despite the gaslighting, you support them still.
You are a shockingly inhumane individually playing the role of a humanitarian.
Ramblings 