Remeber when George Floyd, the criminal, died at the hand of a police officer in the USA. There was outrage and fury. It was shared by UK Labour politicians.
But, as usual, as after the Manchester Arena Islamic suicide terrorist bombing (“Don’t look back in anger), and now, with Henry Nowak’s murder, we are supposed to react quietly.
In spite of the protest that included some violence against the police, we DO react quietly – with pure cold rage:
Apparently, that’s not enough. This is using Nowak for political capital, according to Two-Tier Kier. I have never seen anyone politically milk the quiet response from Henry Nowak’s fatehr as much as Starmer has.
It’s not just politicians trying to play this down when they were outraged at the George Floyd killing.
This is pure gaslighting from Peston. Farage expressed his opinion of the dignified response of Nowak’s father, so to suggest it means nothing to Farage is a dishonest twisting of the narrative – nothing new there.
The feelings of the Nowaks understandable (we don’t know whether they were persuaded to tone their message as they did, as others have been).
But, they are not arbiters of politics. Thought they have suffered the worst of UK racially biased policing, others have too. The Southport killings were also a direct softly-softly response of police. It keeps happening.
And, a reminder again, that Starmer has milked the family’s message, politically! To attack Farage. There has been an insane “Stop Reform” political agenda, and dirty tricks going on for years. Of course they are using Nowak’s message for political gain themselves.
Cold Rage vs Hot Rage
So, what is Farage’s “cold rage“: A person experiencing cold rage after a tragedy might: Become highly determined rather than visibly emotional; Speak calmly but intensely; Methodically pursue legal action; Dedicate their life to exposing wrongdoing.
Hot rage is what most people think of as anger: Intense emotional arousal; Shouting, swearing, crying, or aggressive behaviour; Impulsive actions; Loss of self-control; Scream at those responsible; Demand immediate revenge; Act recklessly.
Where have we seen hot rage before? And it’s in response to THIS we should be quiet.
Support The Sikh Community
Sikhs have integrated well into the UK, and can be seen attending the Unite the Kingdom marches.
This horrific murder was carried out by someone that Sikh leaders had already highligted to the police … another “known to the authorities”.
More so that Muslims, Sikhs have decalred their own outrage and pain at this murder.
In general, Sikh doctrine is notably less hostile toward other religions than many pre-modern religious traditions. The central Sikh scriptures and teachings emphasize devotion to one God, honest living, equality of humanity, and respect for people regardless of religious background.
This is not a religion, or a community, that has built-in animosity twards others they way Islam has.
So, there is no reason at all to attribute the acts of the murderr to any aspect of the Sikh religion or community.
There is, or course, the question of whether Sikhs should be allowed to carry the Kirpan, the ceramonial dagger. But, had it already been banned there was nothing preventing this murder happening.
Two-Tier Policing
Despite denials by many politicials, there can now be little doubt that two-tier policing has contributed to murders.
The Southport killer was “know to the authorities”.
In the case of Nowak’s murder, the police response is clear to see – they were more concenred with believing Nowak’s accusers and murderer, than chcking Nowak’s claim that he had been stabbed and could not breath.
And how can we be sure it was two-tier policing and not just the bad judgement of one copper? Because the policy told them how to react.
There are plenty of antisemitic memes flying around, and some of them are debunked here: Antisemitic Memes: Lies About Israeli Jews. The morons that repeat these do not restrict themselves to lying about Jews.
The accounts that post these may be bots acting from inside or outside the West. These accounts may have few followers, so their direct reach isn;t that great, with perhaps one or two likes per post. However, they drop their memes as replies to popular accounts, and the images are copied and spread by the more gullible.
This page focuses on memes, images, that contain textual claims that can be checked.
Barring Muslims From Office
The claim is false. The McCarran–Walter Act did not forbid Muslims (or any religious group) from holding public office, and no such ban has ever existed in U.S. law. The U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits religious tests for office, meaning people of any faith can serve. As a result, there was nothing in 1990 that could have been “quietly repealed” to allow Muslims into office. The list of politicians is also misleading—it implies involvement in a hidden policy change that simply did not happen.
The real context is that Congress passed the Immigration Act of 1990, which reformed immigration rules by removing outdated quota systems and some discriminatory exclusions tied to nationality and ideology. This was part of a broader modernization of U.S. immigration policy, not a change to eligibility for political office. The meme distorts this routine legislative update into a conspiracy narrative by inventing a restriction that never existed and then claiming it was secretly lifted.
The Epstein Files
The claim is false. There are no “Epstein files” that state, in black and white, that children were dismembered, had their organs removed, or were eaten. Investigations, court documents, and reporting around Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell concern sexual abuse and trafficking of minors, which are serious crimes—but do not include evidence of organ harvesting or cannibalism. Claims like this are fabricated and resemble long-standing conspiracy tropes rather than anything found in verified records.
The real context is that the Epstein case exposed a network of abuse involving wealthy and well-connected individuals, leading to criminal convictions (including Maxwell) and civil cases. Large sets of documents—often referred to online as “Epstein files”—are mostly court filings, depositions, and contact records, many of which are incomplete, disputed, or lack proof of wrongdoing by those named. These documents have been repeatedly misrepresented online, with false or exaggerated claims layered on top to create sensational narratives that go far beyond what any verified evidence shows.
Despite this, there are countless memes that accuse people from different parts of the political spectrum and buisiness. If there’s a connected person you don’t like, create an Epsteing meme to libel them.
There has been an attempt by successive UK governments, as well as by ‘progressive’ activists and press, to boost the narrative that White Supremacism’s “far right” terrorism is a greater threat than Islamic Supremacism’s terrorism.
This post looks at that narrative, why it is an inadequate perspective, and then covers a Channel 4 programme from 2022 that tries to put the freighteners on the public, with the help of some dubious characters. The programme makes fair points about a particularly nasty group of racists, but the agenda of the participants in the programme becomes clearer with a bit more background information.
Which Far Right?
The first slight of hand here is the term, “far right”. Historically in the West we have distinguished far right and far left by the nature of the dominant politics: Fascism is far right, Marxism is far left.
But where does Islam and Islamic extremism fit into this? Well, by Islam’s own definition it is far right: ultra conservative, highly political and judicial (Sharia), misogynistic, homophobic, brutal punishments … it has more in common with Fascism than Marxism.
This becomes more obvious when we look at the history of Muslim Palestinians during and after WWII. There was a Muslim SS division. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, in Germany during the war, encouraged Hitler to exterminate Jews rather than let them expel Jews to Palestine. Many Muslim Palestinians have made it clear they supported Hitler’s ‘solution’ and that they intend to finish the job.
The Fastest Growing
With a majority white non-Muslim population, the UK certainly has a greater potential for growth in white supremacist ‘far right’ terrorism, but the figures don’t match up. This Guardian piece from 2019 tried to pull a fast one: Fastest-growing UK terrorist threat is from far right, say police
What the headline neglects to tell you is that in the article the Islamic extremism remains the far greater risk to the UK. The ‘fastest rising’ claim is based on a very low starting point.
Racism In The UK
While we’re concerend with white racism here, it’s important to point out that there is plenty of non-white racism in the UK. Darcus Howe made the Channel 4 documentary in 2004, primarily about racism in the UK Asian community towards bglack people.
In 2004 Darcus Howe investigated the changing face of racial politics in Britain, predicting trouble ahead for Britain’s ethnic population. In this authored film, he travelled the country expressing his views on a netherworld of unreported violence and prejudice, not between blacks and whites, but between Britain’s increasingly divided ethnic minority groups.
There are a few clips of the programme online:
This is another topic in itself, so here we’re only looking at white racism.
Channel 4 Dispatches: Inside Britain’s Far Right
The title is misleading. The programme puts an under cover journalist into one particular group, Patriotic Alternative (Wikipedia). While I accept much of what the Wiki page has to say about the group, care needs to be taken when considering who is criticising them.
The racial aspect of “white replacement theory” is stupid. It not only racializes the problem, it makes it too easy to oppose a genuine active replacement theory: the Islamization of the West … which has nothing to do with race and everything to do with the problems of Islamic extremism.
The main subject group, “Patriotic Alternative” is one that should be monitored. It may put on a face of simply protecting white culture, but from the programme we can see that there are definitely racist aspects to the movement that could turn violent. The Wiki page makes specific claims abut Neo Nazism links to the group.
The Three Stooges of Islamic Apologetics
However, the programme is tarnished by the use of Nick Lowles, Julia Ebner, Dame Sara Khan.. They are all known for their opposition to anyone criticising Islam – they declare such people far right, whether they are or not.
Lowles (of Hope Not Hate – you see their banners at all the trendy marches, even pro Hamas marches) is the one that produced this false claim that there were reports of acid attacks on a Muslim woman. Not a black women, not a far east woman, … not even an Asian women (Asian Christian?). No, a Muslim woman. It’s important to the narrative to make sure that it appears Muslims are under attack, because for the left Muslims are a (convenient) protected minority ( theere are about 2 billion followers of Islam). The point being that the anti-Islam was a significant factor following the Middlesborough riots.
Ebner has been stirring this “far right” labelling of critics of Islam since at least 2017, with lies in her hit piece while at Quilliam .
As with the other two, Khan will not be found criticizing Islamic extremism too much … it’s far more likely that if an Islamic terrorist attack occurs, her first thoughts will be for the violent backlash against Muslims … that rarely happens. Muslims feel unsafe because other Muslims have committed a terrorist attack … this is how you sustain the notion that Muslims are perpetual victims.
It’s ironic that the three stooges here focus on the far right, when Islam is far right by design. It’s a conservative political ideology that has Sharia at its core, that if implemented as the governance of a state (Caliphate) would see many of the horrors we witness in many Islamic states: homophobia, misogyny, apartheid (dhimmi status), brutal punishments.
In the programme Khan says that although Patriotic Alternative claim to be non-violent, they have the same ideology as far right extremists. … Hilarious. Every moderate Muslim follows the ideology that Islamic terrorists follow – Islam.
So, can we say the same of Muslims that Khan says of Patriotic Alternative, “.. the fact that they are promoting the same ideology, the same dangerous anti-non-Muslim narrative (read the Quran) as extreme Islamic terrorists, they are fundamentally helping to create a climate that is conducive to terrorism and violence. The law in this country at the moment is not adequate to deal with hateful religious political ideologies like Islam.“
The Far Left Appear
There is further irony in the programme after Khan’s words, when the Patriotic Alternative are delivering leaflets in Rotherham and are attacked by a group of masked men. “Patriotic Alternative blame the attack on far left anti-fascists.” … Nick Lowles, do you know anything about that? Bit of a coincidence.
Indoctrination of Children
Ebner is on screen again looking at the ‘educational’ material of Patriotic Alternative, which is clearly promoting racist indoctrination.
Indoctrination in Islam is far greater, as many ex-Muslims will attest. And if you look at how Muslim Palestinians are raised to hate Jews, you might understand the Middle East troubles more clearly. You won’t find the three stooges covering that indoctrination.
The programme goes on to make legitimate claims about the links of Patriotic Alternative members to other more dangerous far right groups. It’s reminiscent of the way we see many ‘moderate’ Muslims in the UK and US have links to more extreme Islamic groups.
Batley & Spen
Along with showing the far right links to people like the killer of MP Jo Cox, Thomas Mair, the programme moves on to the 2021 Batley & Spen by election, where Kim Leadbeater, Jo Cox’s sister, is standing.
We hear that Leadbeater won the seat, and much is made of her being the sister of Cox.
The purpose of this part of the programme is to point out the illegal activities of Patriotic Alternative in putting out fake leaflets supposedly from a Labour union, and then again with a fake leaflet, mimicing Conservatives, in the constituency of murdered David Amess.
What the programme neglects to mention is that
In Batley a school teacher had to go into hiding because of death threats from Islamic extremist (he’s drawn a picture of Mohammed in class to about free speech).
Amess had been killed by an Islamic terrorist.
I appreciate that the programme was about a specific white racist far right group, but what they don’t say is often significant. It’s a common tactic to deflect from or ignore Islamic extremism: Owen Jones – Missing In Action – The Battle of Batley
Summer Camp
The programme turns next to the summer camp held by PA.
The undercover reported has been invited to their mass national gathering. … About a hundred and fifty people are descending on the Peak District.
That’s fewer than many a single extremist mosque. The programme are certainly continuing to hype up the far right influence in the UK.
The summer camp recording certainly exposes nasty racist ideas. PA is definitely a group of racists. The links to other more dangerous “far right” groups is a legitimate concern. There’s also plenty of evidence on X that this is definitely a hateful group.
Avoid them like the plague.
Sadly, useful programmes like this don’t help, because many non-racist Brits know the three stooges for what they are and that will diminish the imapct of a programme like this.
The BBC made a similar programme.
Sara Khan appears again …
There is no good reason why we should allow hateful extremist groups like PA to operate, and I believe there’s an obligation on our Parliament, on our government, to outlaw the activity of groups like Patriotic Alternative. To not do so I think would be a failure.
There are plenty of mosques and Islamic groups that spout just as much hatred, but aimed at unbelievers, homosexuals, … and Jews (they have that in common).
The Three Dangers
These are the ideologies that threaten the West:
Islam, because it is anti Western democracy and freedom. It is an explicitly far right ideology. While many ‘moderate’ Muslims are not themselves extreme, like Sara Khan they enable extremism by opposing criticism of Islam and trying to pass such criticism off as racism.
White racism, because it is infecting fair criticism of ideologies with racism and conflating ideology and race. It’s stupid, because it alienates so many great non-white opponents of Islam and far left extremism.
Marxism and far left activists and apologists for Islam, like Hope Not Hate, and governments that follow their line of criminalising criticism of Islam.
The Red Green Alliance
The Red Green Alliance is one between the far left Marxists and Socialists, and the far right Islamists, both of which hate Western democracy, free markets and capitalism.
This is why we see such bias from our politicians, press and other media, that pust a lot of effort into demonising people as far right, whether they are or not, and neglect as far as is possible extremists of Islam and the far left.
Ramblings 