Novara Media Argue Muslim Palestine has No Right to Exist

Novara Media is a left wing propaganda channel started by Arron Bastani. That’s Aaron Bastani, the author of the naive fantasy work, Fully Automated Luxury Communism.

In the accompanying short, their gaslighting ties their own arguments up in knots and completely destroys decades Muslim fantasies of a Muslim Palestinian state, though it does encourage the genocide of Jews.

The video makes the claim that Israel does not have a right to exist. They point out that the question of whether Israel has a right to exist is propaganda. So, I guess they think the Palestinian claim to a state is propaganda too, right?

They show Francesca Albanese saying, in response to the question of whether Israel has a right to exist, “Israel does exist,” as if that nullifies the quesiton.

They then flip to a show guest who tries to make more of this point than is rationally justifiable.

Let’s just pause for a second on “the right to exist” question, “Does Israel have a right to exist?” It’s a nonsense question. It’s an absurd question. It’s pure propaganda. It’s effectively ‘strat comms’ (strategic communications). The Israeli government came up with it. …”

This is a lie. Muslims came up with the proposal that Israel has NO right to exist, so the Israeli claim that Israel does have a right to exist, is simply rejecting the genocidal intent of Muslims.

What’s more, many of Israel’s enemies claim that Jews have no right to exist. This genocide of the Jews is of no concern to Novara Media and its guests.

How to deny Irael’s right to exist, while trying to avoid sounding like an antisemite.

No other country is ever told that it has a right to exist.

This is duplicitous claim. It is absurd to suggest any country is TOLD it has a right to exist out of the blue. What usually happens is a country CLAIMS the right to exist, and other countries choose to accept or reject that, and individuals choose to accept or reject that claim, and what usually follows is a set of events that determine the outcome of whether it does exist or not.

Israelis CLAIMED a right to exist in 1948, as Pakistanis did in 1947. Israel’s claim was based on the historic presence of persecuted Jews in their homeland. Pakistan’s claim was based on the conequst of India by Muslims that wasn’t going os well.

Both were supported by the powerful international community … though a number of Muslim states immediately rejected Israel’s claim and started a war to demonstrate their point of view – and such aggression is conveniently ignored by Novara Media and its guests. And of course Bangladesh later CLAIMED its right to exist independently of Pakistan. These states are not TOLD they have a right to exist, but they are told they have a right to defend themselves when they do exist. Israel exists and is attacked by Islamic terrorists, and has a right to defend itself. Muslim Palestine does not exist as a state.

So, this video is a gaslighting colouring of the narrative, Novara propaganda, when no other country is told as often as Israel is that it does NOT have the right to exist, which means, “from the river to the sea.” We all know that means wiping Israel and Jews off the map – we know because so many Muslims tell us so, and act on it when they can.

Does the UK have a right to exist? Does Ireland have a right to exist? Does NORTHERN Ireland have a right to exist?

Ah, his emphatic “NORTHERN Ireland” suggests he thinks not, but does he really think the Republic of Ireland has no right to exist? Does someone want to tell the IRA?

Did the former Yugoslavia have a right to exist?

This is a funny one for the commies that saw states like Yogoslavia break up after the fall of the USSR under the weight of its own oppresssion of its people.

Yugoslavia was a group of disparate peoples that had been dominated by larger powers, in the Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The formation of Yugoslavia was again a CLAIMED identity, and later renamed as a state, by the various peoples, as the power of empires shifted. It became a state in 1918, The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, but was rename Yugoslavia in 1929. While the common need for security was a driver for the existence of the larger state, the different peoples later had other ideas, and the inherent friction would lead to the breakup, and the CLAIM of the right to exist for the individual states.

So, again nobody TOLD Yugoslavia to exist, and the suggestion any external entity did or should tell Yugoslavia to exist is far more preposterous than the suggestion that the question of whether Israel has a right to exist is absurd.

I think that Francesca Albanese put it brilliantly about a year ago, when she said, look, the premise of the question is absurd. Does it have a right to exist? It exists.

No, Albanese’s is the absurd point. Whether a state has a right to exist, and its actual existence are two independent variables.

0 0 – Has no right to exist, and does not exist.

0 1 – Has no right to exist, but does exist.

1 0 – Has a right to exist, but does not exist.

1 1 – Has a right to exists, and does exist.

Whether Albanese thinks the question of a right to exist is absurd or not, the existence, or not, of a state IS NOT THE PREMISE OF THE QUESTION.

Albanese has deliberately confused a descriptive fact and a normative fact:

Descriptive fact → Does a state exist?
Normative claim → Does a state have a right to exist?

This is all rhetorical garbage, propaganda, stoked by a deep antisemitic hatred, with conditions that are never applied to non-Jewish states.

A way of challenging legitimacy
Or implying that a currently existing state should not exist / should be dismantled

You see now what they are doing?

Let’s look closer of at what it might mean for a state to have a right to exist. If a state did have a right to exist, then on what grounds might that right be based? Self-determination of the people to declare their state exists, recognition by others, the power to succeed, etc.? Israel would then have that right, and Palestine would not, because they are crap at it.

Or, conversly, if we were to acknowledge that the peoples of a region have a right to self-determination, recognition, power, could we not acknowledge it by assigning states the right to exist? Isn’t that basically what happens? A state takes for itself, through its government, on behalf of its people, the right to exist. We do acknowledge a state’s right to self-defence, which is itself an acceptance of a right to exist without being attacked. We say states are typically said to have sovereignty, recognition, legitimacy. Isn’t that just a variation on the framing of a ‘right to exist’?

So, you can start to see how this attempt to question the question of a state’s right to exist is nothing more than a ploy that is used ONLY against Israel.

And this is what the Novara propaganda is all about: not recognising Israel, delegitimising Israel, opposing the sovereigty of every Israeli Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Druze, Atheists, citizen. But only regarding Israel.

It (Israel) exists. It is a fact that it exists as a nation recognised by the UN.

Well, I’m glad we cleared that up. So no more of this bollocks trying to delegitimise Israel.

But, there is nothing in international law to say that a nation has a right to exist.

Then we are clear, Novara and its guests acknowledge that Muslim Palestine has no right to exist, and it does not exist. Got it. Thank you.

The propagandist goes on to say,

But what there is in international law is something to say that peoples have a right to exist.. All peoples have the right of self-determination.

But according to many on the left, not Israel. Terrorism Islamic states? No problem. Israel? No thank you.

As a matter of fact, Muslim Palestinians have been given that right to a state that exists, and have renounced it themselves many times, because rather than accept co-existence and the recognition of both Muslim Palestine and Israel, they have given up their right by turning to terrorism … because what they wanted was BOTH self-determination for them AND the freedom to determine that Israel does not exist, so denying the rights of the Israeli peoples to self-determination.

Do you accept that Nazis gave up their right to both their self-determination, and to their domination, persecution and murder of other peoples? Then why do you permit that for Muslim Palestinians?

Well, Jews and Muslims and Christian and Druze and other Israelis have a right to self-determination, and to a state, so suck it up and stop excusing Islamic insanity.

Now, if only you’d back up your “self-detrmination” ideal every time Muslims invade and terrorise the state of Israel, but you freaks are rarely anywhere to be seen when Muslims are killing people, in Israel or anywhere else.

So Israel’s right to exist, the fact of Israel’s existence doesn’t give it a right to run an apartheid state, and to perpetrate a genocide against the Palestinian people.

Erm, what was you saying about dodgy premises?

This is the atrocious state of far left politics in the West.

Israel is clearly NOT apartheid – Jews, Muslims, Arabs, Druze, Christians, all live free as Israeli citizens. There are countless videos of Israel Muslims pointing this out …. but here are external white knights TELLING Muslims of Israel they live in an apartheid state.

What about the West Bank and Gaza? The funny thing is, Israel was TOLD it had a right to that land by the power of the international community – i.e. the ‘power’ part of declaring a state.

Now, the West bank is contested territory that was taken from Israel by Jordan. The West Bank was never made an independent state by Jordan but was absorbed into Jordan. And, while Israel controls the region again, for security purposes because Muslim Palestinians launch terrorist attacks from the region, it is not part of an apartheid state.

No complaints from the left when Gaza was held by Egypt, and not created as a Muslim Palestinian state. Only when Israel beat the Egyptians in yet another war on Israel, did Israel occupy Gaza for security reasons, and later pulled out to leave Gazans to create their own state … but they chose terrorism.

If you want to look for apartheid states, you could look to the many Muslim states, all on land conquered by Muslims and turned into apartheid states under dhimmitude and slavery. But, the left are not interested – no Jews no News.

“Genocide” is another pernicious lie that they want to make true by repeating it. It’s almost as if they WANT Israel to commit genocide – many were calling it genocide the day after October 7, of all days, when Muslims explicitly stated their intent to commit genocide.

Throughout the war against Hamas (which admittedly IS much of Gaza, so thorough has been the UN sanctioned indoctrination of Gazan children), there have been claims of starvation, when the ONLY cause of starvation has been Hamas stealing trucks of supplies.

It’s astonishing how blind the left is to Gaza’s own videos, of the October 7 massacre, and the continuous fat arsed Gazans telling us they are starving, and their own videos of fake events.

Gazans are idiots of their own making, that not only make propaganda videos for release to the West, but film themselves making the propaganda and releasing those videos too. Pallywood make fictions that the left take to be documentaries.

The only reasonable conclusion is that the Western left are wilfully ignoring the evidence that genocidal Muslims are out to kill Jews, and the existence of Israel, in the Jewish homeland, upsets them to the point of wanting to kill them even more.

“Oh Muslim, there is a Jew behind me, come kill him.”

The Western left are totally blind to the depth of belief in the escatalogical requirement to kill Jews. When Muslims joined ISIS at its height, and on Octover 7, many Muslims were declaring ecstatically online that the end times were near. They are the ultimate “The End is Nigh” lunatics of our times.

Isn’t it crazy that it might have taken a genocide for liberals and centrists to realise that they have a problem with their support for Israel.

I reject yet another stupid premise of your rhetorical question. Your premise that there is a genocide BY Israel is false. So, no, I have zero problem supporting Israel in the world’s fight against global Islamic terrorism and extremism.

But, I do have a problem with the left’s continued apologetics for Islamic terrorism in THEIR support for the terrorist enclave of Gaza, when the evidence for Islamic terrorism extends way beyond Gaza, the West Bank and Palestine. Muslim Palestinians, Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah, have continued to wreck Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Syria – but of course the left blame Israel for attacking these threats.

It’s not as if the evidence isn’t clear around the world: EVERY DAY someone dies in the name of Islamic terrorism.

https://thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=2025

Propaganda

If you’re not convinced this is antisemitic propaganda, why is it the same message is appearing all over social media? Here’s another propagandist making the same stupid claim that also denies the terrorist Palestinians a state.

Does Israel have a right to exist? Does any nation state? What is a nation-state? Is the concept as old as civilization? Or is it the latest social engineering project of the ruling class?

No, Matthew, your crap is the latest social engineering attampt to jusify the genocide of Jews by the death cult Islamic terrorists of Gaza. Who is Matthew? From his bio:

Oscar nominated filmmaker. Writer. Former guest host for Larry King.

So, a filmmaker, a maker of fantasies. Like Palestine.

Let’s leave the last word on the right of a state to exist to Novara’s Aaron Bastani (from an insane rant of a video clip that deserves its own post).

Which Far Right? White Supremacy or Islamic Supremacy?

There has been an attempt by successive UK governments, as well as by ‘progressive’ activists and press, to boost the narrative that White Supremacism’s “far right” terrorism is a greater threat than Islamic Supremacism’s terrorism.

This post looks at that narrative, why it is an inadequate perspective, and then covers a Channel 4 programme from 2022 that tries to put the freighteners on the public, with the help of some dubious characters. The programme makes fair points about a particularly nasty group of racists, but the agenda of the participants in the programme becomes clearer with a bit more background information.

Which Far Right?

The first slight of hand here is the term, “far right”. Historically in the West we have distinguished far right and far left by the nature of the dominant politics: Fascism is far right, Marxism is far left.

But where does Islam and Islamic extremism fit into this? Well, by Islam’s own definition it is far right: ultra conservative, highly political and judicial (Sharia), misogynistic, homophobic, brutal punishments … it has more in common with Fascism than Marxism.

This becomes more obvious when we look at the history of Muslim Palestinians during and after WWII. There was a Muslim SS division. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, in Germany during the war, encouraged Hitler to exterminate Jews rather than let them expel Jews to Palestine. Many Muslim Palestinians have made it clear they supported Hitler’s ‘solution’ and that they intend to finish the job.

The Fastest Growing

With a majority white non-Muslim population, the UK certainly has a greater potential for growth in white supremacist ‘far right’ terrorism, but the figures don’t match up. This Guardian piece from 2019 tried to pull a fast one: Fastest-growing UK terrorist threat is from far right, say police

What the headline neglects to tell you is that in the article the Islamic extremism remains the far greater risk to the UK. The ‘fastest rising’ claim is based on a very low starting point.

Racism In The UK

While we’re concerend with white racism here, it’s important to point out that there is plenty of non-white racism in the UK. Darcus Howe made the Channel 4 documentary in 2004, primarily about racism in the UK Asian community towards bglack people.

In 2004 Darcus Howe investigated the changing face of racial politics in Britain, predicting trouble ahead for Britain’s ethnic population. In this authored film, he travelled the country expressing his views on a netherworld of unreported violence and prejudice, not between blacks and whites, but between Britain’s increasingly divided ethnic minority groups.

There are a few clips of the programme online:

This is another topic in itself, so here we’re only looking at white racism.

Channel 4 Dispatches: Inside Britain’s Far Right

The title is misleading. The programme puts an under cover journalist into one particular group, Patriotic Alternative (Wikipedia). While I accept much of what the Wiki page has to say about the group, care needs to be taken when considering who is criticising them.

This 2022 Channel 4 Dispatches programme is mostly a good one, exposing a specific racist far right group.

The racial aspect of “white replacement theory” is stupid. It not only racializes the problem, it makes it too easy to oppose a genuine active replacement theory: the Islamization of the West … which has nothing to do with race and everything to do with the problems of Islamic extremism.

The main subject group, “Patriotic Alternative” is one that should be monitored. It may put on a face of simply protecting white culture, but from the programme we can see that there are definitely racist aspects to the movement that could turn violent. The Wiki page makes specific claims abut Neo Nazism links to the group.

The Three Stooges of Islamic Apologetics

However, the programme is tarnished by the use of Nick Lowles, Julia Ebner, Dame Sara Khan.. They are all known for their opposition to anyone criticising Islam – they declare such people far right, whether they are or not.

Lowles (of Hope Not Hate – you see their banners at all the trendy marches, even pro Hamas marches) is the one that produced this false claim that there were reports of acid attacks on a Muslim woman. Not a black women, not a far east woman, … not even an Asian women (Asian Christian?). No, a Muslim woman. It’s important to the narrative to make sure that it appears Muslims are under attack, because for the left Muslims are a (convenient) protected minority ( theere are about 2 billion followers of Islam). The point being that the anti-Islam was a significant factor following the Middlesborough riots.

As posted on X

Ebner has been stirring this “far right” labelling of critics of Islam since at least 2017, with lies in her hit piece while at Quilliam .

As with the other two, Khan will not be found criticizing Islamic extremism too much … it’s far more likely that if an Islamic terrorist attack occurs, her first thoughts will be for the violent backlash against Muslims … that rarely happens. Muslims feel unsafe because other Muslims have committed a terrorist attack … this is how you sustain the notion that Muslims are perpetual victims.

It’s ironic that the three stooges here focus on the far right, when Islam is far right by design. It’s a conservative political ideology that has Sharia at its core, that if implemented as the governance of a state (Caliphate) would see many of the horrors we witness in many Islamic states: homophobia, misogyny, apartheid (dhimmi status), brutal punishments.

In the programme Khan says that although Patriotic Alternative claim to be non-violent, they have the same ideology as far right extremists. … Hilarious. Every moderate Muslim follows the ideology that Islamic terrorists follow – Islam.

So, can we say the same of Muslims that Khan says of Patriotic Alternative, “.. the fact that they are promoting the same ideology, the same dangerous anti-non-Muslim narrative (read the Quran) as extreme Islamic terrorists, they are fundamentally helping to create a climate that is conducive to terrorism and violence. The law in this country at the moment is not adequate to deal with hateful religious political ideologies like Islam.“

The Far Left Appear

There is further irony in the programme after Khan’s words, when the Patriotic Alternative are delivering leaflets in Rotherham and are attacked by a group of masked men. “Patriotic Alternative blame the attack on far left anti-fascists.” … Nick Lowles, do you know anything about that? Bit of a coincidence.

Indoctrination of Children

Ebner is on screen again looking at the ‘educational’ material of Patriotic Alternative, which is clearly promoting racist indoctrination.

Indoctrination in Islam is far greater, as many ex-Muslims will attest. And if you look at how Muslim Palestinians are raised to hate Jews, you might understand the Middle East troubles more clearly. You won’t find the three stooges covering that indoctrination.

The programme goes on to make legitimate claims about the links of Patriotic Alternative members to other more dangerous far right groups. It’s reminiscent of the way we see many ‘moderate’ Muslims in the UK and US have links to more extreme Islamic groups.

Batley & Spen

Along with showing the far right links to people like the killer of MP Jo Cox, Thomas Mair, the programme moves on to the 2021 Batley & Spen by election, where Kim Leadbeater, Jo Cox’s sister, is standing.

We hear that Leadbeater won the seat, and much is made of her being the sister of Cox.

The purpose of this part of the programme is to point out the illegal activities of Patriotic Alternative in putting out fake leaflets supposedly from a Labour union, and then again with a fake leaflet, mimicing Conservatives, in the constituency of murdered David Amess.

What the programme neglects to mention is that

In Batley a school teacher had to go into hiding because of death threats from Islamic extremist (he’s drawn a picture of Mohammed in class to about free speech).
Amess had been killed by an Islamic terrorist.

I appreciate that the programme was about a specific white racist far right group, but what they don’t say is often significant. It’s a common tactic to deflect from or ignore Islamic extremism: Owen Jones – Missing In Action – The Battle of Batley

Summer Camp

The programme turns next to the summer camp held by PA.

The undercover reported has been invited to their mass national gathering. … About a hundred and fifty people are descending on the Peak District.

That’s fewer than many a single extremist mosque. The programme are certainly continuing to hype up the far right influence in the UK.

The summer camp recording certainly exposes nasty racist ideas. PA is definitely a group of racists. The links to other more dangerous “far right” groups is a legitimate concern. There’s also plenty of evidence on X that this is definitely a hateful group.

Avoid them like the plague.

Sadly, useful programmes like this don’t help, because many non-racist Brits know the three stooges for what they are and that will diminish the imapct of a programme like this.

The BBC made a similar programme.

Sara Khan appears again …

There is no good reason why we should allow hateful extremist groups like PA to operate, and I believe there’s an obligation on our Parliament, on our government, to outlaw the activity of groups like Patriotic Alternative. To not do so I think would be a failure.

There are plenty of mosques and Islamic groups that spout just as much hatred, but aimed at unbelievers, homosexuals, … and Jews (they have that in common).

The Three Dangers

These are the ideologies that threaten the West:

Islam, because it is anti Western democracy and freedom. It is an explicitly far right ideology. While many ‘moderate’ Muslims are not themselves extreme, like Sara Khan they enable extremism by opposing criticism of Islam and trying to pass such criticism off as racism.

White racism, because it is infecting fair criticism of ideologies with racism and conflating ideology and race. It’s stupid, because it alienates so many great non-white opponents of Islam and far left extremism.

Marxism and far left activists and apologists for Islam, like Hope Not Hate, and governments that follow their line of criminalising criticism of Islam.

The Red Green Alliance

The Red Green Alliance is one between the far left Marxists and Socialists, and the far right Islamists, both of which hate Western democracy, free markets and capitalism.

This is why we see such bias from our politicians, press and other media, that pust a lot of effort into demonising people as far right, whether they are or not, and neglect as far as is possible extremists of Islam and the far left.

Dumb Conspiracy Theory: Muslims Are Puppets of The USA and Israel

The narrative is that Israel sponsor Hamas, and/or the CIA have something to do with it. This tweet is typical.

We do know the CIA backed the Taliban against the Soviet Union, but later had to fight the Taliban in the “war or terrorism” when coalition forces invaded Afghanistan. And it’s a fair bet to say that the CIA and Israel’s Mosad have their fingers in many pies in the Middle East.

But then so do most Islamist states or organisations – for example, the Israel strike on the Iranian compound in Syria was an attack on a number of actors that are involved in such clandastine activities themselves.

Since 2013 Iran has maintained a presence of its troops in Syria in response to the Syrian civil war, as Syria is a crucial ally of Iran. Additionally, it has been involved in training and funding paramilitary forces from Hezbollah, along with foreign militias from Iraq and Afghanistan, not only in Syria but also in neighboring Lebanon.

Israel attack on Iranians in Syria

But, does the conspiracy theory hold up in sense claimed, that the CIA and Israel have been funding Hamas?

Hold that thought, that question, and for the moment, suppose it is true, that the CIA and Israel have been funding Hamas. This raises another question, and one that conspiracy theoriests of various sorts will be keen to answer – why would they? But let’s park the question of the motivation of the CIA and Israel. Let’s just assume they did.

What next? What can it tell us about the Muslims of Hamas that we didn’t know already?

If you’re a member of a law abiding organisation, a “religion of peace”, that’s at peace with its neighbours, because your neighbours are “people of the book”, what would you do if those neighers said, “Hey, here’s some money, buy some arms and come and attack us so we can make you look bad?” Would you be stupid enough to fall for it?

You see, the problem with this conspiracy theory is it absolves Hamas of all agency in the atrocities they commit, and futher, it is a particularly antisemitic conspiracy, because it feeds off the many antisemitic tropes about Jews and their coniving ways.

It still takes the motivation of the Muslims* of Hamas to actually do the following:

Carry out the atrocities of October 7.
Continue to fire rockets into Israel.
Commit suicide bombings of buses and other targets in Israel.
Indoctrinate their children on Palestinian TV to hate Jews, to become martyrs for Islam, and to stab Jews.

This hatred has been going on for 1400 years, instigated initially by Mohammed when the Jews of Medina would not side with him in his battles – his ‘final solution’ being to massacre the Jews of Medina, and to be invloved in that personally. This has set the model for Jew hatred in Islam ever since.

No, Muslims that support Hamas, al Qaida, ISIS, Boko Haram and many other extremist and terrorist Muslim organisations are fully motivated by Islam, and it is their own agency that is responsible for anything they do.

So, even if it were true that the CIA and Israel funded Hamas, it still takes Muslims to commit the horrifica attacks of October the 7th, and just to remind you, this is what they did, much of it taken from their own phones and body cams. I must warn you that this is terrible, but you have a duty to know what Hamas is capable of.

https://www.thisishamas.com

And this isn’t unique. And nor is this denial of Muslim agency. It happened with ISIS. Of course Obama pulled out of Iraq too soon, leaving it in a mess, and of course Bush and Blair take some blame for attacking Iraq, even though Saddam Hussein was a brutal dicator. But it still required “ordinary Muslims”, “nice young men”, “indoctrinated young girls” to make their way to Syria and Iraq to join ISIS and start genocide of Yazidis, the taking of sex slaves, the burning alive, the chopping of heads, the cricifixions, and all manner of barbarity that echoes the ways of Mohammed and his Merry Men of 1400 years ago.

Muslims are agents that follow the Quran and Hadith. When they kill the way they did on October the 7th, it wasn’t some unusual event, or an act of resistance. It was Islamic terrorism, the Islamic terrorism we have seen time and time again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks

It’s one heck of a long list for a “religion of peace”.

* Muslims of Hamas … when we talk about hamas, ISIS, Boko Haram, and other Islamic terrorist groups, there is often the claim theya re “Nothing to do with Islam” or they do not follow Islam as they should. But it’s only ever Muslims. Even on October 7, I don’t know of any Christians or Druze from Gaza that joined them. Historically there have been instances of Chistians persecuting Jews in Palestine, but these are usually separate incidents. And in the 2oth and 21st centuries I don’t know of any Christians joining any Muslim Islamic terrorist organisation. Why is this significant? Because the narrative of the Middle East conflict is often framed as Israeli v Arab or Jew v Arab, when there are Arab Jews, and other non-Muslim Arabs, and Irainains consider themselves Persion, not Arab, and many reject the “Arab religion”, Islam. It would be far more accurate to speak as we find: Muslims engage in Islamic terrorism, not anyone else.

October 7 – Alluah Akbar Atrocities

“Nothing to do with Islam!” A plea we’ve heard time after time in the West whenever an Islamic terrorist attack has occurred.

Don’t look away, you who are ignorant and say “Islamism is not Islam”, or you shockingly clueless apologists for Islamic madness, as you shout “Stop the genocide! Ceasefire!” and in the next breath “From the river to the sea!” – you have no idea what genocide is.

Listen to the “Allahu Akbar!” cries from the Hamas terrorists as they carry out their work for Allah, the killing of Jews, and the cheering Gazans shouting “Allahu Akbar!” as Hamas return with living and dead trophies of their butchery. This is what “From the river to the sea!” means; this is what ‘Genocide’ means.

I haven’t yet persuaded myself to post the videos here directly. You must take responsibility for yourself, and choose to witness them. Below are links to sites that contain them.

You Have a Duty to Witness Hamas

As horrific as these recordings are, they are a fraction of what happened. Some of the horrors were recorded, but have not been released.

This is Hamas – Some of the blood raw footage filmed and shared by Hamas of Gaza.

Hammas Massacre – Some of the same footage, more images, more horror.

(*These sites may be closed down at some point, by the sensitive souls that don’t want to stare human horror in its face; or by those that don’t like to offend the easily offended; or those who want to protect the bonds of wealth; or by those that love death as you love life.)

Worse Than Nazis?

This evidence should stand as a memorial to the victims of Islamic extremism. The images and videos, many recorded by Hamas and other Gazans themselves, should be on display in every Holocaust museum, because they rank with the work of the Nazis.

No! They are worse than even the Nazis. The horrific glee with which these Muslim ‘Palestinians’ shouted their praise for Allah as they butchered women, children, babies; the pride with which they phoned home to tell their parents of how many Jews they’d killed, surpasses the cold brutality of the Nazis.

If you don’t believe me, watch, and listen … you must listen. We become immune to visual atrocities. But it’s near impossible not to absorb the religious fanatical pleasure that fellow humans indulge in while they are raping and butchering another fellow human.

Videos and Witness Accounts

I suggest you look at and listen to the horrific evidence provided above. Here are other accounts where some of the terrible scenes are blurred out.

Eyewitness Accounts of Sexual Violence Against Israeli Women on October 7th

The interviewer asks, “How do you confront the claim that as long as allegedly there is no evidence of rape, we cannot clearly determine that those Israeli women experienced sexual violence?” (Does she know of Own Jones?)

I want whoever claims this and just wants justice, to come to me, look in my phone. What you see here, this blood stain, from here it was rolled down. I can’t make this public. There is only one interpretation, to the pictures I photographed. Not stories. What I touched with these hands, and saw with these eyes. That alone is enough to discredit any claims of this kind. I will present it at the Criminal Court of Justice in The Hague. There will be noone that can deny what I am telling and what I am showing.

I understand, more and more, that the world is talking to us with human logic, saying, “It can’t be. The UN denies it so it probably did not happen. Bring evidence.” I realised that I was there, when the evidence could be documented. I am here as a civil servant in he service of the people, in the service of the world. It’s for the world. The World needs to know this.
Eye witness accounts

Interviewer, “Can you understand the sweeping denial of events, most of which were photographed? Are these political considerations, or maybe a degree of anti-Semitism?”

I think that the more unimaginable the horrors, the more convenient it is for people who want to deny them, to really stick to that narrative, that it couldn’t have happened. Because it’s so unimaginable, it’s so horrific.

I think we had to admit that anti-Semitism does exist, and we have seen very ugly parts of it in response to October 7.

It was rape. It was abuse. It was body part amputation, or both women and men. It was genital mutilation. We will never know the numbers or the scope. The significant point is they were not sporadic incidents. These were repeated incidents, at the same time in several areas.
Prof. Ruth Halperin-Kaddari

Press Conf. on Sexual Violence Aspects of 7.10 – November 14, 2023

The Death Cult – We Love Death As You Love Life

It is a potential existential error for liberal democratic societies to hear what Islamic extremists say, and then pretend they don’t mean it.

The distinction between a love of death and a love of life is important in understanding Islamic extremism. It’s the basis upon which too many Muslims in Gaza allow their children to be martyrs for Hamas. They may love their children. But too often in the warped manner of a death cult, they love even more the martyrdom of their child, for Allah.

This is no ‘Islamophobic’ message of mine. It comes from their own mouths.

Mohammed Hijab

We hear it from our very own Mohammed Hijab (you can appreciate the narcisism, and the homoerotic appeal to fellow enthusiasts – his sexual outbursts are legendary).

The difference between us and them is that for them, they think life begins. For us, we believe that death begins. We believe that life begins at death. We don’t care about death. We love death.
Mohammed Hijab

You can find the vido of this on youtube; and this Reddit post identifies the part in his rant where he declares the ‘love of death’: Mohammed Hijab admits that Islam is a death cult on video (1:56-2:12)

When you see who else shares his cultish view, you might start to suspect the wisdom of the West of allowing extremists to flourish – tolerating intolerance is itself a suicidal norm now found across the West. Free speech for Islam, that promotes removing your free speech by killing you.

Mohammed Siddique Khan

You might think Mo Hijab a bit of blow hard, all talk and no action. You can’t think the same of Mohammed Saddique Khan, who, with his fellow Muslims was responsible for much death, injury and destruction, as one of the London 7/7 terrorists of July 2005. Suicide bombing is popular among members of the death cult.

We Love Death As You Love Life
Mohammed Siddique Khan

Mohammad Sidique Khan (Urdu: محمد صدیق خان; 20 October 1974 – 7 July 2005) was a Pakistani-British terrorist and the oldest of the four Islamist suicide bombers and believed to be the leader responsible for the 7 July 2005 London bombings, in which bombs were detonated on three London Underground trains and one bus in central London, suicide attacks, killing 56 people including the attackers and injuring over 700. Khan bombed the Edgware Road train killing himself and six other people.
Wikipedia

ISIS – We Love Death

With men who love death as much as you love life, you will never be safe as long as we are alive.
ISIS figher – Islamic State ‘We love death as you love life’ – BBC News

There’s a certain irrational irony to his words, that beckons his own death at the hands of his enemies. Yet, the greater irony is we don’t believe them, until they do it, and even then we find excuses: poverty, Western colonialism.

The following link is from a French documentary (with English voiceover) that follows an ISIS group, and witnesses the build up and final end of one of the Jihadists who prepares to make a suicide attack, and his fairwell has the air of a sinister pleasure, as he takes a captive on the mission with him.

That psychological manipulation reminds me of other videos where ISIS terrorists express their love and best wishes for gay men they are about to throw off a roof.

Psychopaths, made by Islam.

Syria: Jihad Squadrons (english documentary)

Palestinian Leaders

Palestinian women are not like any other women in the world. They view their children as insignificant compared to the homeland.
Abbas Zaki, Fatah Central Committee member

Children of Palestine

The extremism of Islam is bred into the children of Muslims from an early age, and it includes the hatred of Jews, as many ex-Muslims will testify. And sadly, this is a key feature of the views of Muslims of Gaza, who elected Hamas. Even as Hamas committed the 7th October 2023 attacks on Israel, and returned with bodies and hostages, they had the cheering support of the majority of Gazans.

This should not be surprising, since many of those that committed the atrocities of 7th October 2023 are of an age that will have received such a Hamas ‘education’.

I will make my body a bomb that will blast the flesh of Zionists. … I will tear their bodies into little pieces and cause them more pain than they will ever know.
Palestinian Muslim boy, age 11

How do children acquire this mindset?

Mothers of Martyrs

This is a story of one mother who glorifies her son’s martyrdom: Mother of Martyr.

Palestinian Muslim ‘Education’

What can you expect of children who are indoctrinated like this: The Palestinian Incitement Exposed. Some of the scenes from this video are shocking … killers, young butchers:

When you hear the question, “Why are there so many children in Israeli prisons?”, now you know.

The Islamic corruption of innocence has been going on for so long, is it any wonder children grow up hating Jews.

Palestinian Children – The Lagacy of a Death Cult

Death Cult Gazans Wish Martyrdom On Their Children

Antisemitism Terrorist Training of Children

Gazan child …

We asked Hitler why he left some of you (Jews) alive. He did so in order to show us how wicked you are. We will come to you from under the ground and hammer fear into your hearts, and above the ground we will tear your bodies apart with our rockets. Scram into the shelters, you mice, you sons of a Jewish woman!
Inside the Gaza Summer Camps Training Children to be the Next Generation of Terrorists

A prophetic warning from an interviewee,

In ten, fifteen years from now, the kids will be adults or parents, and maybe even officials in Gaza, and decision makers.

Inside the Gaza Summer Camps Training Children to be the Next Generation of Terrorists

Palestinians in Gaza And The Use of Martyrdom

In this recording of the IDF calling and warning Palestinians to leave an area, this is how those Palestinians live their death cult.

They expess tehir wish to be martyrs, specifically to use their own deaths and those of their children as propaganda tools against Israel. They explicitly use themselves and their children as human shields, to protect Hamas (there’s no way of knowing the extent to which Abu Younes is involved with Hamas himself – ‘civillian’ is a generous presumption, given his response.)
They don’t see Jews as humans, and cite the Quran and other Muslim texts as reasons for hating the Jews.

Israel – A Contrast

Despite the many antisemitic induced lies about the war on Hamas of 2023/24, there are of course too many Jews that also devalue life. But that’s not the basis of the Jewish state, or its multi-ethnic and multi-faith citizens who would prefer peace.

We can forgive the Arabs [Muslims] for killing our children. We cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children. We will only have peace with the Arabs [Muslims] when they love their children more than they hate us.
Golda Meir

Another statement expressed the wish for life that drives Israelis

We Jews have a secret weapon in our struggle with the Arabs – We have no place to go.

I guess we have no choice. Either we do everything that is possible, and may seem to others as impossible, and just give up. Or we do everything that is really impossible and we remain alive. There’s one more basic thing that I think that people outside of Israel must realize, and if they understand and accept that, maybe other things will fall into place.

For instance, we’re not the only people in the world who’ve had difficulties with neighbors; that has happened to many. We are the only country in the world whose neighbors do not say, “We are going to war because we want a certain piece of land from Israel,” or waterways or anything of that kind. We’re the only people in the world where our neighbors openly announce they just won’t have us here. And they will not give up fighting and they will not give up war as long as we remain alive. Here.

So this is the crux of the problem: it isn’t anything concrete that they want from us. That’s why it doesn’t make sense when people say, “Give up this and give up the other place. Give up the Golan Heights,” for instance. What happened when we were not on the Golan Heights? We were not on the Golan Heights before ’67, and for 19 years, Syria had guns up there and shot at our agricultural settlements below. We were not on the Golan Heights! So what, if we give up the Golan Heights, they will stop shooting? We were not in the Suez Canal when the war started.

It’s because Egypt and Syria and the other Arab [Muslim] countries refuse to acquiesce to our existence. Therefore there can be no compromise. They say we must be dead. And we say we want to be alive. Between life and death, I don’t know of a compromise. And that’s why we have no choice.”
60 Minutes Interview, September 1973

Thankfully, more and more of the Arab Muslim world is seeing sense, seeing peace and prosperity of not following the expansionist route to Islamic domination (though stealthier means are afoot and aided by the gullible West).

Perhaps after the defeat of Hamas, if a flourishing peaceful Gaza can be rebuilt, perhaps peace will follow.

However, in the back of your mind you must remain cogniscent of an uncomfortable set of facts:

Muslims believe Mohammed was the perfect example.

Mohammed slaughtered Jews personally. Mohammed preached the end times, where

Every tree and rock will say, “Oh Muslim, there is a Jew behind me. Come kill him.”
https://sunnah.com/bukhari:2926 – An ‘authentic’ Hadith, Book 56, Hadith 139

In a cult where the word of Allah is supposedly revealed to the prophet Mohammed, and is supposed to be valid for all time, even in liberal Muslim societies, how do you prevent this thematic hatred of Jews re-appearing?

Even peaceful Muslims, like the Ahmadiyya, are persecuted by fellow Muslims. Why? Because they invented an additional prophet to explain away many non-peaceful aspects of Islam. Ahmadis are persecuted in Pakistan, where their sect originated. You might wonder if they feel the same as Golda Meir …

We will only have peace with fellow Muslims when they love their children more than they hate us.

Hope For Deradicalisation

This is Manwar Ali. He was a radicalised Muslim, and as with many others, he bought into the death cult.

“.. for a long time I lived for death. I was a young man who believed that jihad is to be believed in the language of force and violence.”

You can watch Manwar present his story in this TED talk. Sadly, the indoctrination of children into radical Islam could take several generations to undo, if it can be done at all. Please watch. It’s a moving story.