Antisemitic Memes: Lies About Israeli Jews

Israel is a pluralistic democratic state, the only functional one in the region.

All citizens are equal in most respects. The main differences between citizens are as follows:

Immigration: As the LONE safe state for Jews (after millennia of being exiled from their homeland, only to be exciled from or persecuted or murdered in other lands), Israel prioritises immigration for Jews from anywehere in the world. All other people around the world may apply to become Israeli citizens, but must follow a process typical of those anywhere else. This is intentionally discriminatory in favour of Jews around the world, but is not discriminatory against existing Israeli citizens.
Military: Jewish men and women are required to comply with conscription. Only men of Christians, Druze and other communities are required, but Arab Muslims are not required to comply, though they can and do vulunteer.
Civic Life: All citizens can take part in civic life, becoming MPs, judges, police, etc. There are few if any legal limits, the most obvious being the ability to serve in senior security ranks, which is consistent with making Israel a safe space for Jews.

Nobody complains about much more extreme restrictions when Muslims implement actual apartheid states. No Jews, no news.

So, while Israel is a ‘Jewish State’, it is far less discriminatory than Muslim states, so when you see libelous memes aimed specifically at Jews in Israel, you know you are dealing with an antisemite.

These are some of the libelous claims, many eminating from medival times, and others more recent:

Global Jewish Control / Secret Elite Theory
Jewish Control of Finance / Banks
Media / Hollywood / Cultural Control
Blood Libel”/Jews murder non-Jews (especially children) for ritual purposes
Jews Behind Wars / Crises
Population Replacement / Immigration Plot
Holocaust inversion or Nazi analogy

There’s not a lot you can do to refute the more grotesque graphic memes we have become familiar with, other than describe what they depict and refute that perspective. So, I’m not fucusing on those.

The easier memes to refute, in a way that actually challenges those posting them to come up with evidence, are those that make textual claims, with supposed quotes from leading Jewish/Zionist figures. At least with those it’s more obvious to the poster that they have probably been lied to by the source of the meme. That might not stop them finding others, or resorting to the other more colourfully vile images, but at least they won’t post the misquotes again, without looking even more stupid than they do already.

I have no hisitation exposing the creeps that perpetuate this nonsense, especially when the lies are debunked but they still repeat them.

Big Mac Examples

What you will find are outright lies through intentional misquotes. But, that’s not all. Here’s the real mental gymnastics the fools are :

What these Israelis ACTUALLY said comes nowhere near close the vile and sickening words often used against Jews by Muslims … AND Western “critics of Israel and only Israel” (antisemites).
What these Jews were purported to have said ALSO doesn’t come close to the many vile and sickening words used by the same “critics of Israel”.

Menachem Begin

The quote attributed to Menachem Begin—“Our race is the Master Race… other races are beasts and animals”—is not authentic. There is no credible primary source (no Knesset transcript, recording, or verified publication) supporting it, and it is widely regarded as a fabricated or misattributed quote that circulates without evidence.

What is documented is that during the 1982 Lebanon War, Begin used harsh, dehumanising language about enemies, including phrases referring to attackers as “beasts” or “two-legged animals.” These remarks were made in the context of wartime rhetoric following attacks on Israeli civilians, and while controversial, they are very different from the “master race” quote. The viral version exaggerates and reshapes real rhetoric into something resembling Nazi-style ideology, which is why historians and reliable sources reject it.

Bezalel Smotrich

The quote attributed to Bezalel Smotrich—“International law does not apply to Jews… that’s the difference between the chosen people and the others”—is not authentic. There is no reliable transcript, speech, or interview where he says this, and it appears to be a fabricated or heavily distorted quote that blends religious language with political claims in a way that cannot be verified.

What is true is that Smotrich has made controversial and hardline statements, including arguments that Israeli policy should not be constrained by international law in certain contexts, particularly regarding security and settlements. These are political and ideological positions, often strongly criticised, but they are not framed as racial supremacy or a claim that laws “do not apply to Jews” in the way the viral quote suggests.

Yoav Kisch

The quote attributed to Yoav Kisch—calling people “animals,” saying they “have no right to exist,” and should be “exterminated” with “no limits” until mass flight from Gaza—is not authentic. There is no credible source, transcript, or recording linking him to this wording, and it appears to be a fabricated or composite quote, likely blending real wartime rhetoric from others with invented escalation.

What is true is that during the Gaza war period, some Israeli officials used very harsh and controversial language, and Kisch himself has taken strong pro-military positions in support of Israel’s actions. However, there is no verified instance of him calling for extermination or using this specific language, and the viral quote exaggerates beyond anything reliably documented.

Nissim Vaturi

The quote attributed to Nissim Vaturi—“Erase Gaza… don’t leave a child there, expel everyone”—is not a single, verifiable quote in that form. It is a distorted composite, combining fragments of reported remarks with added wording (“nothing else will satisfy us,” “expel everyone”) that cannot be traced to a clear primary source or single statement.

What is true is that Vaturi did make genuinely extreme and widely criticised comments during the Gaza war period, including calls reported in media for Gaza to be “erased” and statements interpreted as advocating very broad, indiscriminate action. These remarks were controversial in Israel and internationally, but the viral version intensifies and stitches them together, making it sound more systematic and explicit than the documented statements actually were.

Netenyahu and War Crime Claims

The claims in this meme about Benjamin Netanyahu are partly based on real elements, but heavily framed and exaggerated in a misleading way. The language about “cashing in Holocaust credits” and using Judaism as “camouflage” is not a factual statement but a rhetorical, polemical claim. It generalises about “Zionists” and imputes coordinated bad faith—something that cannot be substantiated and often overlaps with longstanding antisemitic tropes (e.g., manipulation, exploiting victimhood). While critics do argue that accusations of antisemitism are sometimes used in political debate to deflect criticism of Israel, the meme presents this as a blanket, intentional strategy, which is not evidence-based and collapses complex disagreements into a single hostile narrative.

What is true is that the International Criminal Court has taken steps related to alleged war crimes in the Israel–Gaza conflict, and there have been high-profile legal and political disputes involving Netanyahu in that context. However, the situation is legally and politically contested, not a settled judgment of guilt, and the wording “WANTED… for war crimes and crimes against humanity” simplifies a complex process into a definitive claim. More broadly, Israel and its supporters do sometimes invoke antisemitism concerns in response to criticism, while critics argue about where the line lies between legitimate criticism and prejudice. The meme turns these real but nuanced issues into a one-sided, accusatory narrative rather than an accurate summary.

While we’re on this subject, let’s debunk that other meme, that the IJC has ruled on their guilt regarding genocide – the IRJC merely admitted that the racists of South Africa could try to show it – of course they have not..

More Big Mac Examples

You’d think having tried and failed with one set of lies, that might be enough. But, no … Big Mac is back …

What we see in these examples are Zionist Jews that have had enough of the passivity of Jews that seem to accept the vile antisemitism, persecution and violence thrown at them. Many accept that the Holocaust was the last straw – I’m astonished at how long Jews have put up with persecution before being able to re-create a Jewish homeland.

The barbaric Islamic conquest was a threat to Europe itself for centuries (and many see it is again), so that even the Crusades were a minor conflict compared to the expansionist wars of Islam, so it wasn’t until the 20th Century that it became practically possible. Therefore, the ACTUAL views these Zionists expressed were hardly unreasonable.

David Ben-Gurion

The quote attributed to David Ben-Gurion—“Sterile Jewish masses living parasitically off of the body of an alien economic body”—is not a reliably verifiable quotation in that form. The specific wording and citation (“Mimaamad Le’am, page 196”) are frequently repeated online, but there is no clear, widely accepted primary source confirming this exact phrasing in English, and it appears to be a distorted or selectively translated fragment rather than a clean, documented quote.

What is true is that early Zionist thinkers, including Ben-Gurion, sometimes used harsh, critical language about Jewish life in the diaspora, influenced by socialist and nationalist ideas of the time. They argued that historical restrictions had pushed many Jews into economically dependent or unbalanced roles, and that Zionism aimed to create a more “productive” society through agriculture and labour. However, these arguments were internal social and economic critiques within a specific historical context, not a blanket condemnation as the viral quote suggests; the circulated version amplifies and strips context, making it appear more extreme and dehumanising than the underlying discussion.

To this day there are many Jews that reject Judiasm and/or Zionism. Fine, but they have no say over the right of Israeli citizens to form a state. Some are miffed because religiously they think God has driven the Jews out of the land of Israel, and so should stay out. Others, particularly Marxists, are a contingent of Jews that, as they wish, want to integrate into other socities, but of course that has rarely gone well for Jews, as antisemites still reject them and want them to leave. Jews are now blamed for their Judaism in killing Christ and for atheism in inventing Marxism.

This is the dilemma for Jews that made Zionism succeed. Muslims want to remain the colonizers of Israel, and kick out the Jews, and non-Muslims waant to kick them out of their countries and send them back to Palestine … or at least that was once the case, for now, it seems, the same Western antisemites don’t want Jews in Israel either. Israel was the only sensible place for Jews to make a stand for survival AND claim a right to the land where the history is predominantly theirs.

It is fitting that Ben-Gurion gave the speech of independence to a nation that is stronger than ever.

Yosef Haim Brenner

The quote attributed to Yosef Haim Brenner—“If the tables were turned and others were like the Jews, wouldn’t we have good cause to hate them as well?”—is not reliably verifiable in that exact wording. This is a recurring theme with these libelous memes.

Again, it circulates online without a clear primary source, and there is no widely accepted, context-confirmed citation showing Brenner wrote or said this sentence as a standalone statement. As with similar examples, it is likely a paraphrase, mistranslation, or selective extraction that has been sharpened into a provocative “quote.”

What is true is that Brenner was known for intense, often harsh self-criticism of Jewish life in the diaspora, reflecting the intellectual climate of early 20th-century Zionism. He wrote candidly about social weakness, dependency, and how Jews were perceived by others, sometimes in deliberately uncomfortable terms meant to provoke reflection and change. In context, such remarks were introspective and critical, not an endorsement of hatred; the viral version removes that context and reframes it as a blunt, self-condemning statement, which misrepresents his intent and tone.

Vladimir Jabotinsky

The quote attributed to Vladimir Jabotinsky—“The Jewish people are a very nasty people. Its neighbors hate it and they’re right.”—is not a reliable, verifiable quotation in that form. This is becoming necessarily repetative to the point that these memes are not merely nasty, but incredibly stupid.

So, … there is no widely accepted primary source confirming he said or wrote this sentence as presented, and it appears to be a distorted or selectively translated fragment that has been turned into a blunt, provocative standalone quote.

What is true is that Jabotinsky, like some other early Zionist thinkers, wrote frankly and sometimes harshly about Jewish conditions in exile and about how Jews were perceived by surrounding societies.

In essays such as The Iron Wall, he argued that conflict between Jews and Arabs was inevitable in the context of competing national movements, and he rejected sentimental or idealised views of coexistence. He has been vindicated many times over, as the Islamic deaath cult neighbours have attacked again and again.

His tone could be stark and unsparing, but it was analytical and strategic rather than self-denigrating in the way the viral quote suggests; the circulated version strips context and reframes complex argument as a crude condemnation, which misrepresents his views.

Uri Zvi Greenberg

The quote attributed to Uri Zvi Greenberg—“Those loathsome Jews are vomited out by any healthy collective…”—is, you guessed it, … not a reliably verifiable quotation in that exact wording. It circulates online without a clear, traceable primary source, and the phrasing strongly suggests a distorted or selectively translated fragment, likely intensified into a blunt, decontextualised statement rather than a faithful citation.

What is true is that Greenberg was an extreme and highly polemical writer, associated with militant Revisionist Zionism, who used very harsh language in his critique of Jewish life in the diaspora. His writings sometimes expressed anger at what he saw as passivity or failure to embrace national revival, and after the Holocaust he framed it in stark, ideological terms about destiny and warning. However, these views were expressed within a specific ideological and literary context, not as simple blanket denunciations of Jews as a people; the viral quote amplifies and strips context, making it appear as crude self-hatred rather than part of a broader (and controversial) ideological argument.

Harold? Who Are These People?

Netanyahu

The quote attributed to Benjamin Netanyahu—about “America as a Golden Calf” to be “sucked dry” and dismantled—is not authentic. There is no credible record, transcript, interview, or archival source from 1990 (or any other time) in which Netanyahu said anything like this. The wording itself contains clear red flags: broken English inconsistent with his fluent, native-level English; sweeping, conspiratorial language; and themes (“we will destroy countries slowly,” “control welfare states”) that do not appear in any verified speeches or writings. This quote circulates primarily on social media and in meme form, without traceable sourcing, which is a strong indicator of fabrication.

What is true is that Netanyahu has been a long-standing, prominent advocate for Israeli security policy and a close U.S.–Israel relationship, often speaking in English to American audiences about shared strategic interests. His documented rhetoric focuses on issues like security threats, regional politics, and alliances—not on secret plots against the United States. The viral quote instead strings together classic conspiracy tropes about manipulation, exploitation, and control, projecting them onto a real figure to give them false credibility.

Porn Sites

This is a common claim. The claim that porn site ownership breaks down as “Christians: 0, Jews: 165” is false and not based on any credible data. There is no authoritative dataset that tracks the religion of owners of adult websites in this way, and the numbers themselves are implausible on their face. The global adult industry is large, fragmented, and often opaque in ownership structure (many sites are owned by companies, holding groups, or shell entities across multiple jurisdictions), making such a precise religious tally impossible to verify. The claim appears to originate from internet memes and unsourced lists, not from research or industry reporting.

What is true is that the adult industry, like most industries, includes people from many different backgrounds, and in some historical cases certain companies or founders have been publicly identified or speculated about—but that is very different from proving any kind of group-based dominance or coordinated pattern. Claims like this typically rely on cherry-picking, assumption of identity, or outright fabrication, and they echo older stereotypes about hidden control or moral corruption. In reality, there is no evidence supporting a religious breakdown of ownership, let alone one as extreme and one-sided as the meme suggests.

Throughout the 21st century there have been genuine exposés of many Christians involved in terrible sex crimes. It would be statistically impossible for there to be no Christian porn site ownership.

Novara Media Argue Muslim Palestine has No Right to Exist

Novara Media is a left wing propaganda channel started by Arron Bastani. That’s Aaron Bastani, the author of the naive fantasy work, Fully Automated Luxury Communism.

In the accompanying short, their gaslighting ties their own arguments up in knots and completely destroys decades Muslim fantasies of a Muslim Palestinian state, though it does encourage the genocide of Jews.

The video makes the claim that Israel does not have a right to exist. They point out that the question of whether Israel has a right to exist is propaganda. So, I guess they think the Palestinian claim to a state is propaganda too, right?

They show Francesca Albanese saying, in response to the question of whether Israel has a right to exist, “Israel does exist,” as if that nullifies the quesiton.

They then flip to a show guest who tries to make more of this point than is rationally justifiable.

Let’s just pause for a second on “the right to exist” question, “Does Israel have a right to exist?” It’s a nonsense question. It’s an absurd question. It’s pure propaganda. It’s effectively ‘strat comms’ (strategic communications). The Israeli government came up with it. …”

This is a lie. Muslims came up with the proposal that Israel has NO right to exist, so the Israeli claim that Israel does have a right to exist, is simply rejecting the genocidal intent of Muslims.

What’s more, many of Israel’s enemies claim that Jews have no right to exist. This genocide of the Jews is of no concern to Novara Media and its guests.

How to deny Irael’s right to exist, while trying to avoid sounding like an antisemite.

No other country is ever told that it has a right to exist.

This is duplicitous claim. It is absurd to suggest any country is TOLD it has a right to exist out of the blue. What usually happens is a country CLAIMS the right to exist, and other countries choose to accept or reject that, and individuals choose to accept or reject that claim, and what usually follows is a set of events that determine the outcome of whether it does exist or not.

Israelis CLAIMED a right to exist in 1948, as Pakistanis did in 1947. Israel’s claim was based on the historic presence of persecuted Jews in their homeland. Pakistan’s claim was based on the conequst of India by Muslims that wasn’t going so well.

Both were supported by the powerful international community of the time … though a number of Muslim states immediately rejected Israel’s claim and started a war to demonstrate their point of view – and such aggression is conveniently ignored by Novara Media and its guest. And of course Bangladesh later CLAIMED its right to exist independently of Pakistan. These states are not TOLD they have a right to exist, but they are told they have a right to defend themselves when they do exist. Israel exists and is attacked by Islamic terrorists, and has a right to defend itself. Muslim Palestine does not exist as a state.

So, this video is a gaslighting colouring of the narrative, Novara propaganda, when no other country is told as often as Israel is that it does NOT have the right to exist, which means, “from the river to the sea.” We all know that means wiping Israel and Jews off the map – we know because so many Muslims tell us so, and act on it when they can.

Does the UK have a right to exist? Does Ireland have a right to exist? Does NORTHERN Ireland have a right to exist?

Ah, his emphatic “NORTHERN Ireland” suggests he thinks not, but does he really think the Republic of Ireland has no right to exist? Does someone want to tell the IRA?

Did the former Yugoslavia have a right to exist?

This is a funny one for the commies that saw states like Yogoslavia break up after the fall of the USSR under the weight of its own oppresssion of its people.

Yugoslavia was a group of disparate peoples that had been dominated by larger powers, in the form of the Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The formation of Yugoslavia was again a CLAIMED identity, and later renamed as a state, by the various peoples, as the power of empires shifted. It became a state in 1918, as The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, but was renamed Yugoslavia in 1929. While the common need for security was a driver for the existence of the larger state, the different peoples later had other ideas, and the inherent friction would lead to the breakup, and the CLAIM of the right to exist for the individual states.

So, again nobody TOLD Yugoslavia to exist, and the suggestion any external entity did or should tell Yugoslavia to exist is far more preposterous than the suggestion that the question of whether Israel has a right to exist is absurd.

I think that Francesca Albanese put it brilliantly about a year ago, when she said, look, the premise of the question is absurd. Does it have a right to exist? It exists.

No, Albanese’s is the absurd point. Whether a state has a right to exist, and its actual existence are two independent variables.

0 0 – Has no right to exist, and does not exist.

0 1 – Has no right to exist, but does exist.

1 0 – Has a right to exist, but does not exist.

1 1 – Has a right to exists, and does exist.

Whether Albanese thinks the question of a right to exist is absurd or not, the existence, or not, of a state IS NOT THE PREMISE OF THE QUESTION.

Albanese has deliberately confused a descriptive fact and a normative fact:

Descriptive fact → Does a state exist?
Normative claim → Does a state have a right to exist?

This is all rhetorical garbage, propaganda, stoked by a deep antisemitism, with conditions that are never applied to non-Jewish states.

A way of challenging legitimacy
Or implying that a currently existing state should not exist / should be dismantled

You see now what they are doing?

Let’s look closer of at what it might mean for a state to have a right to exist. If a state did have a right to exist, then on what grounds might that right be based? 1) Self-determination of the people to declare their state exists; 2) Recognition by others; 3) The power to succeed, etc.?

Israel would then have that right, meeting the three main criteria.

And Palestine would not, because the Palesstinians are crap at it: they have no capacity to self-deteermine because they are more interested in killing Jews; and they have no power to do it, as they have shown since 1948.

Conversly, if we were to acknowledge that the peoples of a region have a right to self-determination, recognition, power, could we not acknowledge it by assigning states the right to exist? Isn’t that basically what happens? A state takes for itself, through its government, on behalf of its people, the right to exist. We do acknowledge a state’s right to self-defence, which is itself an acceptance of a right to exist without being attacked. We say states are typically said to have sovereignty, recognition, legitimacy. Isn’t that just a variation on the framing of a ‘right to exist’?

So, you can start to see how this attempt to question the question of a state’s right to exist is nothing more than a ploy that is used ONLY against Israel.

And this is what the Novara propaganda is all about: not recognising Israel, delegitimising Israel, opposing the sovereigty of every Israeli (Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Druze, Atheist) citizen. But only regarding Israel.

It (Israel) exists. It is a fact that it exists as a nation recognised by the UN.

Well, I’m glad we cleared that up. So no more of this bollocks trying to delegitimise Israel.

But, there is nothing in international law to say that a nation has a right to exist.

Then we are clear, Novara and its guests acknowledge that Muslim Palestine has no right to exist, and it does not exist. Got it. Thank you.

The propagandist goes on to say,

But what there is in international law is something to say that peoples have a right to exist.. All peoples have the right of self-determination.

But according to many on the left, not Israel. Terrorism Islamic states? No problem. Israel? No thank you.

As a matter of fact, Muslim Palestinians have been given that right to having a state that exists, and have renounced it themselves many times, because rather than accept co-existence and the recognition of both apartheid Muslim Palestine and and non-apartheid Israel, they have given up their right by turning to terrorism … because what they wanted was BOTH self-determination for them AND the freedom to determine that Israel does not exist, so denying the rights of the Israeli peoples to self-determination.

Do you accept that Nazis gave up their right to both their self-determination, and to their domination, persecution and murder of other peoples? Then why do you permit that for Muslim Palestinians?

Well, Jews and Muslims and Christian and Druze and other Israelis have a right to self-determination, and to a state, so suck it up and stop excusing Islamic insanity.

If only you’d back up your “self-detrmination” ideal every time Muslims invade and terrorise the state of Israel. But you freaks are rarely anywhere to be seen when Muslims are killing people, in Israel or anywhere else.

So Israel’s right to exist, the fact of Israel’s existence doesn’t give it a right to run an apartheid state, and to perpetrate a genocide against the Palestinian people.

Erm, did you say earlier about dodgy premises?

This is the atrocious state of far left politics in the West.

Israel is clearly NOT apartheid – Jews, Muslims, Arabs, Druze, Christians, all live free as Israeli citizens. There are countless videos of Israel Muslims pointing this out …. but here are external white knights TELLING Muslims of Israel they live in an apartheid state.

What about the West Bank and Gaza? The funny thing is, Israel was TOLD it had a right to that land by the power of the international community – i.e. the ‘power’ part of declaring a state.

Now, the West bank is contested territory that was taken from Israel by Jordan. The West Bank was never made an independent state by Jordan but was absorbed into Jordan. And, while Israel controls the region again, for security purposes because Muslim Palestinians launch terrorist attacks from the region, it is not part of an apartheid state.

No complaints from the left when Gaza was held by Egypt, and not created as a Muslim Palestinian state. Only when Israel beat the Egyptians in yet another war with Israel, did Israel occupy Gaza for security reasons, and later pulled out to leave Gazans to create their own state … but they chose terrorism.

If you want to look for apartheid states, you could look to the many Muslim states, all on land conquered by Muslims and turned into apartheid states under dhimmitude and slavery. But, the left are not interested – no Jews no News.

“Genocide” is another pernicious lie that they want to make true by repeating it. It’s almost as if they WANT Israel to commit genocide – many were calling it genocide the day after October 7, of all days, when Muslims explicitly stated their intent to commit genocide.

Throughout the war against Hamas (which admittedly IS much of Gaza, so thorough has been the UN sanctioned indoctrination of Gazan children), there have been claims of starvation, when the ONLY cause of starvation has been Hamas stealing trucks of supplies.

It’s astonishing how blind the left is to Gaza’s own videos, of the October 7 massacre, and the continuous fat arsed Gazans telling us they are starving, and their own videos of fake events.

Gazans are idiots of their own making, that not only make propaganda videos for release to the West, but film themselves making the propaganda and releasing those videos too. Pallywood make fictions that the left take to be documentaries.

The only reasonable conclusion is that the Western left are wilfully ignoring the evidence that genocidal Muslims are out to kill Jews, and the existence of Israel, in the Jewish homeland, upsets them to the point of wanting to kill them even more.

“Oh Muslim, there is a Jew behind me, come kill him.”

The Western left are totally blind to the depth of belief in the escatalogical requirement to kill Jews. When Muslims joined ISIS at its height, and on Octover 7, many Muslims were declaring ecstatically online that the end times were near. They are the ultimate “The End is Nigh” lunatics of our times.

Isn’t it crazy that it might have taken a genocide for liberals and centrists to realise that they have a problem with their support for Israel.

I reject yet another stupid premise of your rhetorical question. Your premise that there is a genocide BY Israel is false. So, no, I have zero problem supporting Israel in the world’s fight against global Islamic terrorism and extremism.

But, I do have a problem with the left’s continued apologetics for Islamic terrorism in THEIR support for the terrorist enclave of Gaza, when the evidence for Islamic terrorism extends way beyond Gaza, the West Bank and Palestine. Muslim Palestinians, Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah, have continued to wreck Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Syria – but of course the left blame Israel for attacking these threats.

It’s not as if the evidence isn’t clear around the world: EVERY DAY someone dies in the name of Islamic terrorism.

https://thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=2025

Propaganda

If you’re not convinced this is antisemitic propaganda, why is it the same message is appearing all over social media? Here’s another propagandist making the same stupid claim that also denies the terrorist Palestinians a state.

Does Israel have a right to exist? Does any nation state? What is a nation-state? Is the concept as old as civilization? Or is it the latest social engineering project of the ruling class?

No, Matthew, your crap is the latest social engineering attampt to jusify the genocide of Jews by the death cult Islamic terrorists of Gaza. Who is Matthew? From his bio:

Oscar nominated filmmaker. Writer. Former guest host for Larry King.

So, a filmmaker, a maker of fantasies. Like Palestine.

Let’s leave the last word on the right of a state to exist to Novara’s Aaron Bastani (from an insane rant of a video clip that deserves its own post). It seems it’s a legit quation to ask if a state has a right to exist … if it’s an insane death cult running a state not safe for its own people … and if it’s not a safe state for Jews,

Which Far Right? White Supremacy or Islamic Supremacy?

There has been an attempt by successive UK governments, as well as by ‘progressive’ activists and press, to boost the narrative that White Supremacism’s “far right” terrorism is a greater threat than Islamic Supremacism’s terrorism.

This post looks at that narrative, why it is an inadequate perspective, and then covers a Channel 4 programme from 2022 that tries to put the freighteners on the public, with the help of some dubious characters. The programme makes fair points about a particularly nasty group of racists, but the agenda of the participants in the programme becomes clearer with a bit more background information.

Which Far Right?

The first slight of hand here is the term, “far right”. Historically in the West we have distinguished far right and far left by the nature of the dominant politics: Fascism is far right, Marxism is far left.

But where does Islam and Islamic extremism fit into this? Well, by Islam’s own definition it is far right: ultra conservative, highly political and judicial (Sharia), misogynistic, homophobic, brutal punishments … it has more in common with Fascism than Marxism.

This becomes more obvious when we look at the history of Muslim Palestinians during and after WWII. There was a Muslim SS division. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, in Germany during the war, encouraged Hitler to exterminate Jews rather than let them expel Jews to Palestine. Many Muslim Palestinians have made it clear they supported Hitler’s ‘solution’ and that they intend to finish the job.

The Fastest Growing

With a majority white non-Muslim population, the UK certainly has a greater potential for growth in white supremacist ‘far right’ terrorism, but the figures don’t match up. This Guardian piece from 2019 tried to pull a fast one: Fastest-growing UK terrorist threat is from far right, say police

What the headline neglects to tell you is that in the article the Islamic extremism remains the far greater risk to the UK. The ‘fastest rising’ claim is based on a very low starting point.

Racism In The UK

While we’re concerend with white racism here, it’s important to point out that there is plenty of non-white racism in the UK. Darcus Howe made the Channel 4 documentary in 2004, primarily about racism in the UK Asian community towards bglack people.

In 2004 Darcus Howe investigated the changing face of racial politics in Britain, predicting trouble ahead for Britain’s ethnic population. In this authored film, he travelled the country expressing his views on a netherworld of unreported violence and prejudice, not between blacks and whites, but between Britain’s increasingly divided ethnic minority groups.

There are a few clips of the programme online:

This is another topic in itself, so here we’re only looking at white racism.

Channel 4 Dispatches: Inside Britain’s Far Right

The title is misleading. The programme puts an under cover journalist into one particular group, Patriotic Alternative (Wikipedia). While I accept much of what the Wiki page has to say about the group, care needs to be taken when considering who is criticising them.

This 2022 Channel 4 Dispatches programme is mostly a good one, exposing a specific racist far right group.

The racial aspect of “white replacement theory” is stupid. It not only racializes the problem, it makes it too easy to oppose a genuine active replacement theory: the Islamization of the West … which has nothing to do with race and everything to do with the problems of Islamic extremism.

The main subject group, “Patriotic Alternative” is one that should be monitored. It may put on a face of simply protecting white culture, but from the programme we can see that there are definitely racist aspects to the movement that could turn violent. The Wiki page makes specific claims abut Neo Nazism links to the group.

The Three Stooges of Islamic Apologetics

However, the programme is tarnished by the use of Nick Lowles, Julia Ebner, Dame Sara Khan.. They are all known for their opposition to anyone criticising Islam – they declare such people far right, whether they are or not.

Lowles (of Hope Not Hate – you see their banners at all the trendy marches, even pro Hamas marches) is the one that produced this false claim that there were reports of acid attacks on a Muslim woman. Not a black women, not a far east woman, … not even an Asian women (Asian Christian?). No, a Muslim woman. It’s important to the narrative to make sure that it appears Muslims are under attack, because for the left Muslims are a (convenient) protected minority ( theere are about 2 billion followers of Islam). The point being that the anti-Islam was a significant factor following the Middlesborough riots.

As posted on X

Ebner has been stirring this “far right” labelling of critics of Islam since at least 2017, with lies in her hit piece while at Quilliam .

As with the other two, Khan will not be found criticizing Islamic extremism too much … it’s far more likely that if an Islamic terrorist attack occurs, her first thoughts will be for the violent backlash against Muslims … that rarely happens. Muslims feel unsafe because other Muslims have committed a terrorist attack … this is how you sustain the notion that Muslims are perpetual victims.

It’s ironic that the three stooges here focus on the far right, when Islam is far right by design. It’s a conservative political ideology that has Sharia at its core, that if implemented as the governance of a state (Caliphate) would see many of the horrors we witness in many Islamic states: homophobia, misogyny, apartheid (dhimmi status), brutal punishments.

In the programme Khan says that although Patriotic Alternative claim to be non-violent, they have the same ideology as far right extremists. … Hilarious. Every moderate Muslim follows the ideology that Islamic terrorists follow – Islam.

So, can we say the same of Muslims that Khan says of Patriotic Alternative, “.. the fact that they are promoting the same ideology, the same dangerous anti-non-Muslim narrative (read the Quran) as extreme Islamic terrorists, they are fundamentally helping to create a climate that is conducive to terrorism and violence. The law in this country at the moment is not adequate to deal with hateful religious political ideologies like Islam.“

The Far Left Appear

There is further irony in the programme after Khan’s words, when the Patriotic Alternative are delivering leaflets in Rotherham and are attacked by a group of masked men. “Patriotic Alternative blame the attack on far left anti-fascists.” … Nick Lowles, do you know anything about that? Bit of a coincidence.

Indoctrination of Children

Ebner is on screen again looking at the ‘educational’ material of Patriotic Alternative, which is clearly promoting racist indoctrination.

Indoctrination in Islam is far greater, as many ex-Muslims will attest. And if you look at how Muslim Palestinians are raised to hate Jews, you might understand the Middle East troubles more clearly. You won’t find the three stooges covering that indoctrination.

The programme goes on to make legitimate claims about the links of Patriotic Alternative members to other more dangerous far right groups. It’s reminiscent of the way we see many ‘moderate’ Muslims in the UK and US have links to more extreme Islamic groups.

Batley & Spen

Along with showing the far right links to people like the killer of MP Jo Cox, Thomas Mair, the programme moves on to the 2021 Batley & Spen by election, where Kim Leadbeater, Jo Cox’s sister, is standing.

We hear that Leadbeater won the seat, and much is made of her being the sister of Cox.

The purpose of this part of the programme is to point out the illegal activities of Patriotic Alternative in putting out fake leaflets supposedly from a Labour union, and then again with a fake leaflet, mimicing Conservatives, in the constituency of murdered David Amess.

What the programme neglects to mention is that

In Batley a school teacher had to go into hiding because of death threats from Islamic extremist (he’s drawn a picture of Mohammed in class to about free speech).
Amess had been killed by an Islamic terrorist.

I appreciate that the programme was about a specific white racist far right group, but what they don’t say is often significant. It’s a common tactic to deflect from or ignore Islamic extremism: Owen Jones – Missing In Action – The Battle of Batley

Summer Camp

The programme turns next to the summer camp held by PA.

The undercover reported has been invited to their mass national gathering. … About a hundred and fifty people are descending on the Peak District.

That’s fewer than many a single extremist mosque. The programme are certainly continuing to hype up the far right influence in the UK.

The summer camp recording certainly exposes nasty racist ideas. PA is definitely a group of racists. The links to other more dangerous “far right” groups is a legitimate concern. There’s also plenty of evidence on X that this is definitely a hateful group.

Avoid them like the plague.

Sadly, useful programmes like this don’t help, because many non-racist Brits know the three stooges for what they are and that will diminish the imapct of a programme like this.

The BBC made a similar programme.

Sara Khan appears again …

There is no good reason why we should allow hateful extremist groups like PA to operate, and I believe there’s an obligation on our Parliament, on our government, to outlaw the activity of groups like Patriotic Alternative. To not do so I think would be a failure.

There are plenty of mosques and Islamic groups that spout just as much hatred, but aimed at unbelievers, homosexuals, … and Jews (they have that in common).

The Three Dangers

These are the ideologies that threaten the West:

Islam, because it is anti Western democracy and freedom. It is an explicitly far right ideology. While many ‘moderate’ Muslims are not themselves extreme, like Sara Khan they enable extremism by opposing criticism of Islam and trying to pass such criticism off as racism.

White racism, because it is infecting fair criticism of ideologies with racism and conflating ideology and race. It’s stupid, because it alienates so many great non-white opponents of Islam and far left extremism.

Marxism and far left activists and apologists for Islam, like Hope Not Hate, and governments that follow their line of criminalising criticism of Islam.

The Red Green Alliance

The Red Green Alliance is one between the far left Marxists and Socialists, and the far right Islamists, both of which hate Western democracy, free markets and capitalism.

This is why we see such bias from our politicians, press and other media, that pust a lot of effort into demonising people as far right, whether they are or not, and neglect as far as is possible extremists of Islam and the far left.

Dumb Conspiracy Theory: Muslims Are Puppets of The USA and Israel

The narrative is that Israel sponsor Hamas, and/or the CIA have something to do with it. This tweet is typical.

We do know the CIA backed the Taliban against the Soviet Union, but later had to fight the Taliban in the “war or terrorism” when coalition forces invaded Afghanistan. And it’s a fair bet to say that the CIA and Israel’s Mosad have their fingers in many pies in the Middle East.

But then so do most Islamist states or organisations – for example, the Israel strike on the Iranian compound in Syria was an attack on a number of actors that are involved in such clandastine activities themselves.

Since 2013 Iran has maintained a presence of its troops in Syria in response to the Syrian civil war, as Syria is a crucial ally of Iran. Additionally, it has been involved in training and funding paramilitary forces from Hezbollah, along with foreign militias from Iraq and Afghanistan, not only in Syria but also in neighboring Lebanon.

Israel attack on Iranians in Syria

But, does the conspiracy theory hold up in sense claimed, that the CIA and Israel have been funding Hamas?

Hold that thought, that question, and for the moment, suppose it is true, that the CIA and Israel have been funding Hamas. This raises another question, and one that conspiracy theoriests of various sorts will be keen to answer – why would they? But let’s park the question of the motivation of the CIA and Israel. Let’s just assume they did.

What next? What can it tell us about the Muslims of Hamas that we didn’t know already?

If you’re a member of a law abiding organisation, a “religion of peace”, that’s at peace with its neighbours, because your neighbours are “people of the book”, what would you do if those neighers said, “Hey, here’s some money, buy some arms and come and attack us so we can make you look bad?” Would you be stupid enough to fall for it?

You see, the problem with this conspiracy theory is it absolves Hamas of all agency in the atrocities they commit, and futher, it is a particularly antisemitic conspiracy, because it feeds off the many antisemitic tropes about Jews and their coniving ways.

It still takes the motivation of the Muslims* of Hamas to actually do the following:

Carry out the atrocities of October 7.
Continue to fire rockets into Israel.
Commit suicide bombings of buses and other targets in Israel.
Indoctrinate their children on Palestinian TV to hate Jews, to become martyrs for Islam, and to stab Jews.

This hatred has been going on for 1400 years, instigated initially by Mohammed when the Jews of Medina would not side with him in his battles – his ‘final solution’ being to massacre the Jews of Medina, and to be invloved in that personally. This has set the model for Jew hatred in Islam ever since.

No, Muslims that support Hamas, al Qaida, ISIS, Boko Haram and many other extremist and terrorist Muslim organisations are fully motivated by Islam, and it is their own agency that is responsible for anything they do.

So, even if it were true that the CIA and Israel funded Hamas, it still takes Muslims to commit the horrifica attacks of October the 7th, and just to remind you, this is what they did, much of it taken from their own phones and body cams. I must warn you that this is terrible, but you have a duty to know what Hamas is capable of.

https://www.thisishamas.com

And this isn’t unique. And nor is this denial of Muslim agency. It happened with ISIS. Of course Obama pulled out of Iraq too soon, leaving it in a mess, and of course Bush and Blair take some blame for attacking Iraq, even though Saddam Hussein was a brutal dicator. But it still required “ordinary Muslims”, “nice young men”, “indoctrinated young girls” to make their way to Syria and Iraq to join ISIS and start genocide of Yazidis, the taking of sex slaves, the burning alive, the chopping of heads, the cricifixions, and all manner of barbarity that echoes the ways of Mohammed and his Merry Men of 1400 years ago.

Muslims are agents that follow the Quran and Hadith. When they kill the way they did on October the 7th, it wasn’t some unusual event, or an act of resistance. It was Islamic terrorism, the Islamic terrorism we have seen time and time again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks

It’s one heck of a long list for a “religion of peace”.

* Muslims of Hamas … when we talk about hamas, ISIS, Boko Haram, and other Islamic terrorist groups, there is often the claim theya re “Nothing to do with Islam” or they do not follow Islam as they should. But it’s only ever Muslims. Even on October 7, I don’t know of any Christians or Druze from Gaza that joined them. Historically there have been instances of Chistians persecuting Jews in Palestine, but these are usually separate incidents. And in the 2oth and 21st centuries I don’t know of any Christians joining any Muslim Islamic terrorist organisation. Why is this significant? Because the narrative of the Middle East conflict is often framed as Israeli v Arab or Jew v Arab, when there are Arab Jews, and other non-Muslim Arabs, and Irainains consider themselves Persion, not Arab, and many reject the “Arab religion”, Islam. It would be far more accurate to speak as we find: Muslims engage in Islamic terrorism, not anyone else.

October 7 – Alluah Akbar Atrocities

“Nothing to do with Islam!” A plea we’ve heard time after time in the West whenever an Islamic terrorist attack has occurred.

Don’t look away, you who are ignorant and say “Islamism is not Islam”, or you shockingly clueless apologists for Islamic madness, as you shout “Stop the genocide! Ceasefire!” and in the next breath “From the river to the sea!” – you have no idea what genocide is.

Listen to the “Allahu Akbar!” cries from the Hamas terrorists as they carry out their work for Allah, the killing of Jews, and the cheering Gazans shouting “Allahu Akbar!” as Hamas return with living and dead trophies of their butchery. This is what “From the river to the sea!” means; this is what ‘Genocide’ means.

I haven’t yet persuaded myself to post the videos here directly. You must take responsibility for yourself, and choose to witness them. Below are links to sites that contain them.

You Have a Duty to Witness Hamas

As horrific as these recordings are, they are a fraction of what happened. Some of the horrors were recorded, but have not been released.

This is Hamas – Some of the blood raw footage filmed and shared by Hamas of Gaza.

Hammas Massacre – Some of the same footage, more images, more horror.

(*These sites may be closed down at some point, by the sensitive souls that don’t want to stare human horror in its face; or by those that don’t like to offend the easily offended; or those who want to protect the bonds of wealth; or by those that love death as you love life.)

Worse Than Nazis?

This evidence should stand as a memorial to the victims of Islamic extremism. The images and videos, many recorded by Hamas and other Gazans themselves, should be on display in every Holocaust museum, because they rank with the work of the Nazis.

No! They are worse than even the Nazis. The horrific glee with which these Muslim ‘Palestinians’ shouted their praise for Allah as they butchered women, children, babies; the pride with which they phoned home to tell their parents of how many Jews they’d killed, surpasses the cold brutality of the Nazis.

If you don’t believe me, watch, and listen … you must listen. We become immune to visual atrocities. But it’s near impossible not to absorb the religious fanatical pleasure that fellow humans indulge in while they are raping and butchering another fellow human.

Videos and Witness Accounts

I suggest you look at and listen to the horrific evidence provided above. Here are other accounts where some of the terrible scenes are blurred out.

Eyewitness Accounts of Sexual Violence Against Israeli Women on October 7th

The interviewer asks, “How do you confront the claim that as long as allegedly there is no evidence of rape, we cannot clearly determine that those Israeli women experienced sexual violence?” (Does she know of Own Jones?)

I want whoever claims this and just wants justice, to come to me, look in my phone. What you see here, this blood stain, from here it was rolled down. I can’t make this public. There is only one interpretation, to the pictures I photographed. Not stories. What I touched with these hands, and saw with these eyes. That alone is enough to discredit any claims of this kind. I will present it at the Criminal Court of Justice in The Hague. There will be noone that can deny what I am telling and what I am showing.

I understand, more and more, that the world is talking to us with human logic, saying, “It can’t be. The UN denies it so it probably did not happen. Bring evidence.” I realised that I was there, when the evidence could be documented. I am here as a civil servant in he service of the people, in the service of the world. It’s for the world. The World needs to know this.
Eye witness accounts

Interviewer, “Can you understand the sweeping denial of events, most of which were photographed? Are these political considerations, or maybe a degree of anti-Semitism?”

I think that the more unimaginable the horrors, the more convenient it is for people who want to deny them, to really stick to that narrative, that it couldn’t have happened. Because it’s so unimaginable, it’s so horrific.

I think we had to admit that anti-Semitism does exist, and we have seen very ugly parts of it in response to October 7.

It was rape. It was abuse. It was body part amputation, or both women and men. It was genital mutilation. We will never know the numbers or the scope. The significant point is they were not sporadic incidents. These were repeated incidents, at the same time in several areas.
Prof. Ruth Halperin-Kaddari

Press Conf. on Sexual Violence Aspects of 7.10 – November 14, 2023

The Death Cult – We Love Death As You Love Life

It is a potential existential error for liberal democratic societies to hear what Islamic extremists say, and then pretend they don’t mean it.

The distinction between a love of death and a love of life is important in understanding Islamic extremism. It’s the basis upon which too many Muslims in Gaza allow their children to be martyrs for Hamas. They may love their children. But too often in the warped manner of a death cult, they love even more the martyrdom of their child, for Allah.

This is no ‘Islamophobic’ message of mine. It comes from their own mouths.

Mohammed Hijab

We hear it from our very own Mohammed Hijab (you can appreciate the narcisism, and the homoerotic appeal to fellow enthusiasts – his sexual outbursts are legendary).

The difference between us and them is that for them, they think life begins. For us, we believe that death begins. We believe that life begins at death. We don’t care about death. We love death.
Mohammed Hijab

You can find the vido of this on youtube; and this Reddit post identifies the part in his rant where he declares the ‘love of death’: Mohammed Hijab admits that Islam is a death cult on video (1:56-2:12)

When you see who else shares his cultish view, you might start to suspect the wisdom of the West of allowing extremists to flourish – tolerating intolerance is itself a suicidal norm now found across the West. Free speech for Islam, that promotes removing your free speech by killing you.

Mohammed Siddique Khan

You might think Mo Hijab a bit of blow hard, all talk and no action. You can’t think the same of Mohammed Saddique Khan, who, with his fellow Muslims was responsible for much death, injury and destruction, as one of the London 7/7 terrorists of July 2005. Suicide bombing is popular among members of the death cult.

We Love Death As You Love Life
Mohammed Siddique Khan

Mohammad Sidique Khan (Urdu: محمد صدیق خان; 20 October 1974 – 7 July 2005) was a Pakistani-British terrorist and the oldest of the four Islamist suicide bombers and believed to be the leader responsible for the 7 July 2005 London bombings, in which bombs were detonated on three London Underground trains and one bus in central London, suicide attacks, killing 56 people including the attackers and injuring over 700. Khan bombed the Edgware Road train killing himself and six other people.
Wikipedia

ISIS – We Love Death

With men who love death as much as you love life, you will never be safe as long as we are alive.
ISIS figher – Islamic State ‘We love death as you love life’ – BBC News

There’s a certain irrational irony to his words, that beckons his own death at the hands of his enemies. Yet, the greater irony is we don’t believe them, until they do it, and even then we find excuses: poverty, Western colonialism.

The following link is from a French documentary (with English voiceover) that follows an ISIS group, and witnesses the build up and final end of one of the Jihadists who prepares to make a suicide attack, and his fairwell has the air of a sinister pleasure, as he takes a captive on the mission with him.

That psychological manipulation reminds me of other videos where ISIS terrorists express their love and best wishes for gay men they are about to throw off a roof.

Psychopaths, made by Islam.

Syria: Jihad Squadrons (english documentary)

Palestinian Leaders

Palestinian women are not like any other women in the world. They view their children as insignificant compared to the homeland.
Abbas Zaki, Fatah Central Committee member

Children of Palestine

The extremism of Islam is bred into the children of Muslims from an early age, and it includes the hatred of Jews, as many ex-Muslims will testify. And sadly, this is a key feature of the views of Muslims of Gaza, who elected Hamas. Even as Hamas committed the 7th October 2023 attacks on Israel, and returned with bodies and hostages, they had the cheering support of the majority of Gazans.

This should not be surprising, since many of those that committed the atrocities of 7th October 2023 are of an age that will have received such a Hamas ‘education’.

I will make my body a bomb that will blast the flesh of Zionists. … I will tear their bodies into little pieces and cause them more pain than they will ever know.
Palestinian Muslim boy, age 11

How do children acquire this mindset?

Mothers of Martyrs

This is a story of one mother who glorifies her son’s martyrdom: Mother of Martyr.

Palestinian Muslim ‘Education’

What can you expect of children who are indoctrinated like this: The Palestinian Incitement Exposed. Some of the scenes from this video are shocking … killers, young butchers:

When you hear the question, “Why are there so many children in Israeli prisons?”, now you know.

The Islamic corruption of innocence has been going on for so long, is it any wonder children grow up hating Jews.

Palestinian Children – The Lagacy of a Death Cult

Death Cult Gazans Wish Martyrdom On Their Children

Antisemitism Terrorist Training of Children

Gazan child …

We asked Hitler why he left some of you (Jews) alive. He did so in order to show us how wicked you are. We will come to you from under the ground and hammer fear into your hearts, and above the ground we will tear your bodies apart with our rockets. Scram into the shelters, you mice, you sons of a Jewish woman!
Inside the Gaza Summer Camps Training Children to be the Next Generation of Terrorists

A prophetic warning from an interviewee,

In ten, fifteen years from now, the kids will be adults or parents, and maybe even officials in Gaza, and decision makers.

Inside the Gaza Summer Camps Training Children to be the Next Generation of Terrorists

Palestinians in Gaza And The Use of Martyrdom

In this recording of the IDF calling and warning Palestinians to leave an area, this is how those Palestinians live their death cult.

They expess tehir wish to be martyrs, specifically to use their own deaths and those of their children as propaganda tools against Israel. They explicitly use themselves and their children as human shields, to protect Hamas (there’s no way of knowing the extent to which Abu Younes is involved with Hamas himself – ‘civillian’ is a generous presumption, given his response.)
They don’t see Jews as humans, and cite the Quran and other Muslim texts as reasons for hating the Jews.

Israel – A Contrast

Despite the many antisemitic induced lies about the war on Hamas of 2023/24, there are of course too many Jews that also devalue life. But that’s not the basis of the Jewish state, or its multi-ethnic and multi-faith citizens who would prefer peace.

We can forgive the Arabs [Muslims] for killing our children. We cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children. We will only have peace with the Arabs [Muslims] when they love their children more than they hate us.
Golda Meir

Another statement expressed the wish for life that drives Israelis

We Jews have a secret weapon in our struggle with the Arabs – We have no place to go.

I guess we have no choice. Either we do everything that is possible, and may seem to others as impossible, and just give up. Or we do everything that is really impossible and we remain alive. There’s one more basic thing that I think that people outside of Israel must realize, and if they understand and accept that, maybe other things will fall into place.

For instance, we’re not the only people in the world who’ve had difficulties with neighbors; that has happened to many. We are the only country in the world whose neighbors do not say, “We are going to war because we want a certain piece of land from Israel,” or waterways or anything of that kind. We’re the only people in the world where our neighbors openly announce they just won’t have us here. And they will not give up fighting and they will not give up war as long as we remain alive. Here.

So this is the crux of the problem: it isn’t anything concrete that they want from us. That’s why it doesn’t make sense when people say, “Give up this and give up the other place. Give up the Golan Heights,” for instance. What happened when we were not on the Golan Heights? We were not on the Golan Heights before ’67, and for 19 years, Syria had guns up there and shot at our agricultural settlements below. We were not on the Golan Heights! So what, if we give up the Golan Heights, they will stop shooting? We were not in the Suez Canal when the war started.

It’s because Egypt and Syria and the other Arab [Muslim] countries refuse to acquiesce to our existence. Therefore there can be no compromise. They say we must be dead. And we say we want to be alive. Between life and death, I don’t know of a compromise. And that’s why we have no choice.”
60 Minutes Interview, September 1973

Thankfully, more and more of the Arab Muslim world is seeing sense, seeing peace and prosperity of not following the expansionist route to Islamic domination (though stealthier means are afoot and aided by the gullible West).

Perhaps after the defeat of Hamas, if a flourishing peaceful Gaza can be rebuilt, perhaps peace will follow.

However, in the back of your mind you must remain cogniscent of an uncomfortable set of facts:

Muslims believe Mohammed was the perfect example.

Mohammed slaughtered Jews personally. Mohammed preached the end times, where

Every tree and rock will say, “Oh Muslim, there is a Jew behind me. Come kill him.”
https://sunnah.com/bukhari:2926 – An ‘authentic’ Hadith, Book 56, Hadith 139

In a cult where the word of Allah is supposedly revealed to the prophet Mohammed, and is supposed to be valid for all time, even in liberal Muslim societies, how do you prevent this thematic hatred of Jews re-appearing?

Even peaceful Muslims, like the Ahmadiyya, are persecuted by fellow Muslims. Why? Because they invented an additional prophet to explain away many non-peaceful aspects of Islam. Ahmadis are persecuted in Pakistan, where their sect originated. You might wonder if they feel the same as Golda Meir …

We will only have peace with fellow Muslims when they love their children more than they hate us.

Hope For Deradicalisation

This is Manwar Ali. He was a radicalised Muslim, and as with many others, he bought into the death cult.

“.. for a long time I lived for death. I was a young man who believed that jihad is to be believed in the language of force and violence.”

You can watch Manwar present his story in this TED talk. Sadly, the indoctrination of children into radical Islam could take several generations to undo, if it can be done at all. Please watch. It’s a moving story.