Antisemitic Memes: Lies About Israeli Jews

Israel is a pluralistic democratic state, the only functional one in the region.

All citizens are equal in most respects. The main differences between citizens are as follows:

Immigration: As the LONE safe state for Jews (after millennia of being exiled from their homeland, only to be exciled from or persecuted or murdered in other lands), Israel prioritises immigration for Jews from anywehere in the world. All other people around the world may apply to become Israeli citizens, but must follow a process typical of those anywhere else. This is intentionally discriminatory in favour of Jews around the world, but is not discriminatory against existing Israeli citizens.
Military: Jewish men and women are required to comply with conscription. Only men of Christians, Druze and other communities are required, but Arab Muslims are not required to comply, though they can and do vulunteer.
Civic Life: All citizens can take part in civic life, becoming MPs, judges, police, etc. There are few if any legal limits, the most obvious being the ability to serve in senior security ranks, which is consistent with making Israel a safe space for Jews.

Nobody complains about much more extreme restrictions when Muslims implement actual apartheid states. No Jews, no news.

So, while Israel is a ‘Jewish State’, it is far less discriminatory than Muslim states, so when you see libelous memes aimed specifically at Jews in Israel, you know you are dealing with an antisemite.

These are some of the libelous claims, many eminating from medival times, and others more recent:

Global Jewish Control / Secret Elite Theory
Jewish Control of Finance / Banks
Media / Hollywood / Cultural Control
Blood Libel”/Jews murder non-Jews (especially children) for ritual purposes
Jews Behind Wars / Crises
Population Replacement / Immigration Plot
Holocaust inversion or Nazi analogy

I have no hisitation exposing the creeps that perpetuate this nonsense, especially when the lies are debunked but they still repeat them.

Big Mac Examples

What you will find are outright lies through intentional misquotes. But, that’s not all. Here’s the real mental gymnastics the fools are :

What these Israelis ACTUALLY said comes nowhere near close the vile and sickening words often used against Jews by Muslims … AND Western “critics of Israel and only Israel” (antisemites).
What these Jews were purported to have said ALSO doesn’t come close to the many vile and sickening words used by the same “critics of Israel”.

Menachem Begin

The quote attributed to Menachem Begin—“Our race is the Master Race… other races are beasts and animals”—is not authentic. There is no credible primary source (no Knesset transcript, recording, or verified publication) supporting it, and it is widely regarded as a fabricated or misattributed quote that circulates without evidence.

What is documented is that during the 1982 Lebanon War, Begin used harsh, dehumanising language about enemies, including phrases referring to attackers as “beasts” or “two-legged animals.” These remarks were made in the context of wartime rhetoric following attacks on Israeli civilians, and while controversial, they are very different from the “master race” quote. The viral version exaggerates and reshapes real rhetoric into something resembling Nazi-style ideology, which is why historians and reliable sources reject it.

Bezalel Smotrich

The quote attributed to Bezalel Smotrich—“International law does not apply to Jews… that’s the difference between the chosen people and the others”—is not authentic. There is no reliable transcript, speech, or interview where he says this, and it appears to be a fabricated or heavily distorted quote that blends religious language with political claims in a way that cannot be verified.

What is true is that Smotrich has made controversial and hardline statements, including arguments that Israeli policy should not be constrained by international law in certain contexts, particularly regarding security and settlements. These are political and ideological positions, often strongly criticised, but they are not framed as racial supremacy or a claim that laws “do not apply to Jews” in the way the viral quote suggests.

Yoav Kisch

The quote attributed to Yoav Kisch—calling people “animals,” saying they “have no right to exist,” and should be “exterminated” with “no limits” until mass flight from Gaza—is not authentic. There is no credible source, transcript, or recording linking him to this wording, and it appears to be a fabricated or composite quote, likely blending real wartime rhetoric from others with invented escalation.

What is true is that during the Gaza war period, some Israeli officials used very harsh and controversial language, and Kisch himself has taken strong pro-military positions in support of Israel’s actions. However, there is no verified instance of him calling for extermination or using this specific language, and the viral quote exaggerates beyond anything reliably documented.

Nissim Vaturi

The quote attributed to Nissim Vaturi—“Erase Gaza… don’t leave a child there, expel everyone”—is not a single, verifiable quote in that form. It is a distorted composite, combining fragments of reported remarks with added wording (“nothing else will satisfy us,” “expel everyone”) that cannot be traced to a clear primary source or single statement.

What is true is that Vaturi did make genuinely extreme and widely criticised comments during the Gaza war period, including calls reported in media for Gaza to be “erased” and statements interpreted as advocating very broad, indiscriminate action. These remarks were controversial in Israel and internationally, but the viral version intensifies and stitches them together, making it sound more systematic and explicit than the documented statements actually were.

Netenyahu and War Crime Claims

The claims in this meme about Benjamin Netanyahu are partly based on real elements, but heavily framed and exaggerated in a misleading way. The language about “cashing in Holocaust credits” and using Judaism as “camouflage” is not a factual statement but a rhetorical, polemical claim. It generalises about “Zionists” and imputes coordinated bad faith—something that cannot be substantiated and often overlaps with longstanding antisemitic tropes (e.g., manipulation, exploiting victimhood). While critics do argue that accusations of antisemitism are sometimes used in political debate to deflect criticism of Israel, the meme presents this as a blanket, intentional strategy, which is not evidence-based and collapses complex disagreements into a single hostile narrative.

What is true is that the International Criminal Court has taken steps related to alleged war crimes in the Israel–Gaza conflict, and there have been high-profile legal and political disputes involving Netanyahu in that context. However, the situation is legally and politically contested, not a settled judgment of guilt, and the wording “WANTED… for war crimes and crimes against humanity” simplifies a complex process into a definitive claim. More broadly, Israel and its supporters do sometimes invoke antisemitism concerns in response to criticism, while critics argue about where the line lies between legitimate criticism and prejudice. The meme turns these real but nuanced issues into a one-sided, accusatory narrative rather than an accurate summary.

While we’re on this subject, let’s debunk that other meme, that the IJC has ruled on their guilt regarding genocide – the IRJC merely admitted that the racists of South Africa could try to show it – of course they have not..

More Big Mac Examples

You’d think having tried and failed with one set of lies, that might be enough. But, no … Big Mac is back …

What we see in these examples are Zionist Jews that have had enough of the passivity of Jews that seem to accept the vile antisemitism, persecution and violence thrown at them. Many accept that the Holocaust was the last straw – I’m astonished at how long Jews have put up with persecution before being able to re-create a Jewish homeland.

The barbaric Islamic conquest was a threat to Europe itself for centuries (and many see it is again), so that even the Crusades were a minor conflict compared to the expansionist wars of Islam, so it wasn’t until the 20th Century that it became practically possible. Therefore, the ACTUAL views these Zionists expressed were hardly unreasonable.

David Ben-Gurion

The quote attributed to David Ben-Gurion—“Sterile Jewish masses living parasitically off of the body of an alien economic body”—is not a reliably verifiable quotation in that form. The specific wording and citation (“Mimaamad Le’am, page 196”) are frequently repeated online, but there is no clear, widely accepted primary source confirming this exact phrasing in English, and it appears to be a distorted or selectively translated fragment rather than a clean, documented quote.

What is true is that early Zionist thinkers, including Ben-Gurion, sometimes used harsh, critical language about Jewish life in the diaspora, influenced by socialist and nationalist ideas of the time. They argued that historical restrictions had pushed many Jews into economically dependent or unbalanced roles, and that Zionism aimed to create a more “productive” society through agriculture and labour. However, these arguments were internal social and economic critiques within a specific historical context, not a blanket condemnation as the viral quote suggests; the circulated version amplifies and strips context, making it appear more extreme and dehumanising than the underlying discussion.

To this day there are many Jews that reject Judiasm and/or Zionism. Fine, but they have no say over the right of Israeli citizens to form a state. Some are miffed because religiously they think God has driven the Jews out of the land of Israel, and so should stay out. Others, particularly Marxists, are a contingent of Jews that, as they wish, want to integrate into other socities, but of course that has rarely gone well for Jews, as antisemites still reject them and want them to leave. Jews are now blamed for their Judaism in killing Christ and for atheism in inventing Marxism.

This is the dilemma for Jews that made Zionism succeed. Muslims want to remain the colonizers of Israel, and kick out the Jews, and non-Muslims waant to kick them out of their countries and send them back to Palestine … or at least that was once the case, for now, it seems, the same Western antisemites don’t want Jews in Israel either. Israel was the only sensible place for Jews to make a stand for survival AND claim a right to the land where the history is predominantly theirs.

It is fitting that Ben-Gurion gave the speech of independence to a nation that is stronger than ever.

Yosef Haim Brenner

The quote attributed to Yosef Haim Brenner—“If the tables were turned and others were like the Jews, wouldn’t we have good cause to hate them as well?”—is not reliably verifiable in that exact wording. This is a recurring theme with these libelous memes.

Again, it circulates online without a clear primary source, and there is no widely accepted, context-confirmed citation showing Brenner wrote or said this sentence as a standalone statement. As with similar examples, it is likely a paraphrase, mistranslation, or selective extraction that has been sharpened into a provocative “quote.”

What is true is that Brenner was known for intense, often harsh self-criticism of Jewish life in the diaspora, reflecting the intellectual climate of early 20th-century Zionism. He wrote candidly about social weakness, dependency, and how Jews were perceived by others, sometimes in deliberately uncomfortable terms meant to provoke reflection and change. In context, such remarks were introspective and critical, not an endorsement of hatred; the viral version removes that context and reframes it as a blunt, self-condemning statement, which misrepresents his intent and tone.

Vladimir Jabotinsky

The quote attributed to Vladimir Jabotinsky—“The Jewish people are a very nasty people. Its neighbors hate it and they’re right.”—is not a reliable, verifiable quotation in that form. This is becoming necessarily repetative to the point that these memes are not merely nasty, but incredibly stupid.

So, … there is no widely accepted primary source confirming he said or wrote this sentence as presented, and it appears to be a distorted or selectively translated fragment that has been turned into a blunt, provocative standalone quote.

What is true is that Jabotinsky, like some other early Zionist thinkers, wrote frankly and sometimes harshly about Jewish conditions in exile and about how Jews were perceived by surrounding societies.

In essays such as The Iron Wall, he argued that conflict between Jews and Arabs was inevitable in the context of competing national movements, and he rejected sentimental or idealised views of coexistence. He has been vindicated many times over, as the Islamic deaath cult neighbours have attacked again and again.

His tone could be stark and unsparing, but it was analytical and strategic rather than self-denigrating in the way the viral quote suggests; the circulated version strips context and reframes complex argument as a crude condemnation, which misrepresents his views.

Uri Zvi Greenberg

The quote attributed to Uri Zvi Greenberg—“Those loathsome Jews are vomited out by any healthy collective…”—is, you guessed it, … not a reliably verifiable quotation in that exact wording. It circulates online without a clear, traceable primary source, and the phrasing strongly suggests a distorted or selectively translated fragment, likely intensified into a blunt, decontextualised statement rather than a faithful citation.

What is true is that Greenberg was an extreme and highly polemical writer, associated with militant Revisionist Zionism, who used very harsh language in his critique of Jewish life in the diaspora. His writings sometimes expressed anger at what he saw as passivity or failure to embrace national revival, and after the Holocaust he framed it in stark, ideological terms about destiny and warning. However, these views were expressed within a specific ideological and literary context, not as simple blanket denunciations of Jews as a people; the viral quote amplifies and strips context, making it appear as crude self-hatred rather than part of a broader (and controversial) ideological argument.

Novara Media Argue Muslim Palestine has No Right to Exist

Novara Media is a left wing propaganda channel started by Arron Bastani. That’s Aaron Bastani, the author of the naive fantasy work, Fully Automated Luxury Communism.

In the accompanying short, their gaslighting ties their own arguments up in knots and completely destroys decades Muslim fantasies of a Muslim Palestinian state, though it does encourage the genocide of Jews.

The video makes the claim that Israel does not have a right to exist. They point out that the question of whether Israel has a right to exist is propaganda. So, I guess they think the Palestinian claim to a state is propaganda too, right?

They show Francesca Albanese saying, in response to the question of whether Israel has a right to exist, “Israel does exist,” as if that nullifies the quesiton.

They then flip to a show guest who tries to make more of this point than is rationally justifiable.

Let’s just pause for a second on “the right to exist” question, “Does Israel have a right to exist?” It’s a nonsense question. It’s an absurd question. It’s pure propaganda. It’s effectively ‘strat comms’ (strategic communications). The Israeli government came up with it. …”

This is a lie. Muslims came up with the proposal that Israel has NO right to exist, so the Israeli claim that Israel does have a right to exist, is simply rejecting the genocidal intent of Muslims.

What’s more, many of Israel’s enemies claim that Jews have no right to exist. This genocide of the Jews is of no concern to Novara Media and its guests.

How to deny Irael’s right to exist, while trying to avoid sounding like an antisemite.

No other country is ever told that it has a right to exist.

This is duplicitous claim. It is absurd to suggest any country is TOLD it has a right to exist out of the blue. What usually happens is a country CLAIMS the right to exist, and other countries choose to accept or reject that, and individuals choose to accept or reject that claim, and what usually follows is a set of events that determine the outcome of whether it does exist or not.

Israelis CLAIMED a right to exist in 1948, as Pakistanis did in 1947. Israel’s claim was based on the historic presence of persecuted Jews in their homeland. Pakistan’s claim was based on the conequst of India by Muslims that wasn’t going so well.

Both were supported by the powerful international community of the time … though a number of Muslim states immediately rejected Israel’s claim and started a war to demonstrate their point of view – and such aggression is conveniently ignored by Novara Media and its guest. And of course Bangladesh later CLAIMED its right to exist independently of Pakistan. These states are not TOLD they have a right to exist, but they are told they have a right to defend themselves when they do exist. Israel exists and is attacked by Islamic terrorists, and has a right to defend itself. Muslim Palestine does not exist as a state.

So, this video is a gaslighting colouring of the narrative, Novara propaganda, when no other country is told as often as Israel is that it does NOT have the right to exist, which means, “from the river to the sea.” We all know that means wiping Israel and Jews off the map – we know because so many Muslims tell us so, and act on it when they can.

Does the UK have a right to exist? Does Ireland have a right to exist? Does NORTHERN Ireland have a right to exist?

Ah, his emphatic “NORTHERN Ireland” suggests he thinks not, but does he really think the Republic of Ireland has no right to exist? Does someone want to tell the IRA?

Did the former Yugoslavia have a right to exist?

This is a funny one for the commies that saw states like Yogoslavia break up after the fall of the USSR under the weight of its own oppresssion of its people.

Yugoslavia was a group of disparate peoples that had been dominated by larger powers, in the form of the Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The formation of Yugoslavia was again a CLAIMED identity, and later renamed as a state, by the various peoples, as the power of empires shifted. It became a state in 1918, as The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, but was renamed Yugoslavia in 1929. While the common need for security was a driver for the existence of the larger state, the different peoples later had other ideas, and the inherent friction would lead to the breakup, and the CLAIM of the right to exist for the individual states.

So, again nobody TOLD Yugoslavia to exist, and the suggestion any external entity did or should tell Yugoslavia to exist is far more preposterous than the suggestion that the question of whether Israel has a right to exist is absurd.

I think that Francesca Albanese put it brilliantly about a year ago, when she said, look, the premise of the question is absurd. Does it have a right to exist? It exists.

No, Albanese’s is the absurd point. Whether a state has a right to exist, and its actual existence are two independent variables.

0 0 – Has no right to exist, and does not exist.

0 1 – Has no right to exist, but does exist.

1 0 – Has a right to exist, but does not exist.

1 1 – Has a right to exists, and does exist.

Whether Albanese thinks the question of a right to exist is absurd or not, the existence, or not, of a state IS NOT THE PREMISE OF THE QUESTION.

Albanese has deliberately confused a descriptive fact and a normative fact:

Descriptive fact → Does a state exist?
Normative claim → Does a state have a right to exist?

This is all rhetorical garbage, propaganda, stoked by a deep antisemitism, with conditions that are never applied to non-Jewish states.

A way of challenging legitimacy
Or implying that a currently existing state should not exist / should be dismantled

You see now what they are doing?

Let’s look closer of at what it might mean for a state to have a right to exist. If a state did have a right to exist, then on what grounds might that right be based? 1) Self-determination of the people to declare their state exists; 2) Recognition by others; 3) The power to succeed, etc.?

Israel would then have that right, meeting the three main criteria.

And Palestine would not, because the Palesstinians are crap at it: they have no capacity to self-deteermine because they are more interested in killing Jews; and they have no power to do it, as they have shown since 1948.

Conversly, if we were to acknowledge that the peoples of a region have a right to self-determination, recognition, power, could we not acknowledge it by assigning states the right to exist? Isn’t that basically what happens? A state takes for itself, through its government, on behalf of its people, the right to exist. We do acknowledge a state’s right to self-defence, which is itself an acceptance of a right to exist without being attacked. We say states are typically said to have sovereignty, recognition, legitimacy. Isn’t that just a variation on the framing of a ‘right to exist’?

So, you can start to see how this attempt to question the question of a state’s right to exist is nothing more than a ploy that is used ONLY against Israel.

And this is what the Novara propaganda is all about: not recognising Israel, delegitimising Israel, opposing the sovereigty of every Israeli (Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Druze, Atheist) citizen. But only regarding Israel.

It (Israel) exists. It is a fact that it exists as a nation recognised by the UN.

Well, I’m glad we cleared that up. So no more of this bollocks trying to delegitimise Israel.

But, there is nothing in international law to say that a nation has a right to exist.

Then we are clear, Novara and its guests acknowledge that Muslim Palestine has no right to exist, and it does not exist. Got it. Thank you.

The propagandist goes on to say,

But what there is in international law is something to say that peoples have a right to exist.. All peoples have the right of self-determination.

But according to many on the left, not Israel. Terrorism Islamic states? No problem. Israel? No thank you.

As a matter of fact, Muslim Palestinians have been given that right to having a state that exists, and have renounced it themselves many times, because rather than accept co-existence and the recognition of both apartheid Muslim Palestine and and non-apartheid Israel, they have given up their right by turning to terrorism … because what they wanted was BOTH self-determination for them AND the freedom to determine that Israel does not exist, so denying the rights of the Israeli peoples to self-determination.

Do you accept that Nazis gave up their right to both their self-determination, and to their domination, persecution and murder of other peoples? Then why do you permit that for Muslim Palestinians?

Well, Jews and Muslims and Christian and Druze and other Israelis have a right to self-determination, and to a state, so suck it up and stop excusing Islamic insanity.

If only you’d back up your “self-detrmination” ideal every time Muslims invade and terrorise the state of Israel. But you freaks are rarely anywhere to be seen when Muslims are killing people, in Israel or anywhere else.

So Israel’s right to exist, the fact of Israel’s existence doesn’t give it a right to run an apartheid state, and to perpetrate a genocide against the Palestinian people.

Erm, did you say earlier about dodgy premises?

This is the atrocious state of far left politics in the West.

Israel is clearly NOT apartheid – Jews, Muslims, Arabs, Druze, Christians, all live free as Israeli citizens. There are countless videos of Israel Muslims pointing this out …. but here are external white knights TELLING Muslims of Israel they live in an apartheid state.

What about the West Bank and Gaza? The funny thing is, Israel was TOLD it had a right to that land by the power of the international community – i.e. the ‘power’ part of declaring a state.

Now, the West bank is contested territory that was taken from Israel by Jordan. The West Bank was never made an independent state by Jordan but was absorbed into Jordan. And, while Israel controls the region again, for security purposes because Muslim Palestinians launch terrorist attacks from the region, it is not part of an apartheid state.

No complaints from the left when Gaza was held by Egypt, and not created as a Muslim Palestinian state. Only when Israel beat the Egyptians in yet another war with Israel, did Israel occupy Gaza for security reasons, and later pulled out to leave Gazans to create their own state … but they chose terrorism.

If you want to look for apartheid states, you could look to the many Muslim states, all on land conquered by Muslims and turned into apartheid states under dhimmitude and slavery. But, the left are not interested – no Jews no News.

“Genocide” is another pernicious lie that they want to make true by repeating it. It’s almost as if they WANT Israel to commit genocide – many were calling it genocide the day after October 7, of all days, when Muslims explicitly stated their intent to commit genocide.

Throughout the war against Hamas (which admittedly IS much of Gaza, so thorough has been the UN sanctioned indoctrination of Gazan children), there have been claims of starvation, when the ONLY cause of starvation has been Hamas stealing trucks of supplies.

It’s astonishing how blind the left is to Gaza’s own videos, of the October 7 massacre, and the continuous fat arsed Gazans telling us they are starving, and their own videos of fake events.

Gazans are idiots of their own making, that not only make propaganda videos for release to the West, but film themselves making the propaganda and releasing those videos too. Pallywood make fictions that the left take to be documentaries.

The only reasonable conclusion is that the Western left are wilfully ignoring the evidence that genocidal Muslims are out to kill Jews, and the existence of Israel, in the Jewish homeland, upsets them to the point of wanting to kill them even more.

“Oh Muslim, there is a Jew behind me, come kill him.”

The Western left are totally blind to the depth of belief in the escatalogical requirement to kill Jews. When Muslims joined ISIS at its height, and on Octover 7, many Muslims were declaring ecstatically online that the end times were near. They are the ultimate “The End is Nigh” lunatics of our times.

Isn’t it crazy that it might have taken a genocide for liberals and centrists to realise that they have a problem with their support for Israel.

I reject yet another stupid premise of your rhetorical question. Your premise that there is a genocide BY Israel is false. So, no, I have zero problem supporting Israel in the world’s fight against global Islamic terrorism and extremism.

But, I do have a problem with the left’s continued apologetics for Islamic terrorism in THEIR support for the terrorist enclave of Gaza, when the evidence for Islamic terrorism extends way beyond Gaza, the West Bank and Palestine. Muslim Palestinians, Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah, have continued to wreck Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Syria – but of course the left blame Israel for attacking these threats.

It’s not as if the evidence isn’t clear around the world: EVERY DAY someone dies in the name of Islamic terrorism.

https://thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=2025

Propaganda

If you’re not convinced this is antisemitic propaganda, why is it the same message is appearing all over social media? Here’s another propagandist making the same stupid claim that also denies the terrorist Palestinians a state.

Does Israel have a right to exist? Does any nation state? What is a nation-state? Is the concept as old as civilization? Or is it the latest social engineering project of the ruling class?

No, Matthew, your crap is the latest social engineering attampt to jusify the genocide of Jews by the death cult Islamic terrorists of Gaza. Who is Matthew? From his bio:

Oscar nominated filmmaker. Writer. Former guest host for Larry King.

So, a filmmaker, a maker of fantasies. Like Palestine.

Let’s leave the last word on the right of a state to exist to Novara’s Aaron Bastani (from an insane rant of a video clip that deserves its own post). It seems it’s a legit quation to ask if a state has a right to exist … if it’s an insane death cult running a state not safe for its own people … and if it’s not a safe state for Jews,